1 point
  1. This is why I say “10” is not a number, it just means one big group and zero remainder.
  2. I am a huuuuge proponent of dozenal (base-12)
permalink
report
reply
1 point

10 is actually only 2. The number of people misunderstanding binary here is mind blowing xD.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Octal is base 8. Decimal is base A. Hexadecimal is base G. Any questions?

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Jesus Christ.

I just realized that we call binary base2 and there’s no 2 in that numbering system. We call hexadecimal base16 but there’s no 16 (at least not like we know it). But then why is base10 base10? We have a 10…but it’s not a single digit number.

Why is this reminding me of Project Hail Mary?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Every base has ten, but it’s made of two digits

Binary 0, 1, 10 Ternary 0, 1, 2, 10 … Decimal 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Hex 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, A, B, C, D, E, F, 10

Each has the right count of digits for its base before you go two-digit - binary has two (0, 1), etc

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

more precisely, every base has 10, but it’s usually not equal to ten. ten is a fixed value, while 10 depends on the base. you still count normally (one two three four five), even in a base two system. you just write it differently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I like that the alien has 4 fingers. Fitting!

permalink
report
reply
0 points

It’s 10 fingers. Just keep your freaky 11 finger hands of this serious discussion

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Wouldn’t it be 22?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yes, in total, but 11 per hand

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Huh, that’s a good point. A better universal naming system would be something like “Base x+1”, with x being one integer lower than 10. So humans would use Base 9+1, and the alien would use Base 3+1.

*This has been on my mind all day and the more I think about it, the more obvious it becomes how fundamentally terrible the name “Base-10” is. How did this never occur to the people who coined the term? Even the system I suggested is flawed as it’s still trying to incorporate the same bad logic.

A better system would be something like Base 9, stopping shy of the respective 10 in each system, or if it needs to be clarified, Base 9+0, as 0 is the extra digit in the first place, not 10.

permalink
report
reply
0 points
*

we’d only be able to represent bases for numbers with one digit though because what does base 15+1 mean? the 15 could be in any base higher than 5. the clearest way would probably be to just represent it with lines or something “base ||||||||||”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Base 16 is typically represented with letters being used as the extra numerals, so it would end up being F+1. Problem solved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

what about numbers larger than 16?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.2K

    Posts

  • 51K

    Comments