212 points

Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer Kent Walker, says the DOJ is pushing “a radical interventionist agenda that would harm Americans and America’s global technology leadership.”

I’m honestly curious how this would “harm Americans”.

permalink
report
reply
102 points

Google pretending they have any other nationality other then “the global internet” is cute in a disgusting way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points

That statement is technically true.

The billionaire owners are Americans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points
*

Everyone really does need to have that at the forefront of their mind. When the C-suit, wall street, and politicians talk about “Americans” they aren’t talking about us schlubs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The corporations are people too!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I refuse to call any Billionaires Americans. A billionaire in America has far more in common with a billionaire in Ireland or France than with working class Americans. They don’t use our schools, drink our water, drive our roads, or rely on our safety nets. They don’t take out the trash, do their laundry, wait 6 months for a doctor’s appointment, or stress over defunding their retirement to pay for needed medication.

Billionaire involvement in politics should be considered foreign interference. Of course AIPAC is foreign interference too, but apparently that’s not a problem either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer sounds like Donald Trump

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I fear this is exactly who they’re courting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

It harms wealthy asshole Americans at Google.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The same ruling would ban Google from paying other browsers to make Google the default search engine.
This would kill Firefox and make Chromium the only browser engine that’s left.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s really sad…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It would leave the newly-split-off chrome in the same financial situation as firefox. Arguably a worse one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

…a radical interventionist agenda…

That language seems very “Trump-esque”, and I doubt it is a coincidence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How does chrome make money? It uses ads from Google, chrome on it’s own is not a business.

Say you buy chrome, you have to options

  1. Ads built into chrome itself (when you’re in the settings menu, homepage, reading a PDF, playing the dino game)

  2. Force your own default search engine, or get a company like Google or Bing to pay you for the privilege of being a default search engine.

Neither of these options are better than the status quo

permalink
report
parent
reply
131 points

This is the last antitrust win we’ll get for years, isn’t it?

I know Trump doesn’t like Big Tech, but I doubt his admin will punish them meaningfully, but just rail about censorship.

permalink
report
reply
81 points

This isn’t a win I think. They are yet to meet in the court with Google.

The DOJ will file a revised version of its proposals in early March, before the government and Google return to the DC District Court in April for a two-week remedies trial.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I keep saying this. In 2 months all this antitrust stuff goes out the window. If people actually bothered to show up on 11/5 Kahn and co could actually get some wins for the American people. Instead, we’re going to get more monopolies shoved down our throats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Our govt is pay for play at this point, I struggle to see anything like this going through, especially so close to a new AG appointment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
111 points

Ehh just fight it for a month pay king trump some money and bam their golden.

permalink
report
reply
44 points

This is exactly what will happen. Same thing with Albertsons and Kroger too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Okay but consider them taking this moment to let Elon buy it and using it to control information on the clients end 💀

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Maybe we’ll actually see people switch to Firefox if that happens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That would end the internet/world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Google ditched their “don’t be evil” motto, so yeah, this is on the table.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The fact that this is TOTALLY WITHIN REALM OF REALITY is PROOF that Trump is Draining The Swamp!

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

If they’re allowed to choose who they sell it to this won’t change anything

permalink
report
reply
53 points

I think they should sell it to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

4 $ Final Offer

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Too much for me, I’m out 🏳️

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Sell it to Mozilla so they can make it uninstall itself and install Firefox instead in the next update

permalink
report
parent
reply

imagine they sell it so some random homeless guy in Australia for 1 cent

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points
*

Just…please for the love of whatever diety do Microsoft. Fucking sick of their shit recently with One Drive.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Do you have a few minutes to learn about our lord and savior Linux?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Man the Linux propaganda is STRONG on Lemmy. I’ll say what I’ve said before: I use my computer for gaming, web browsing, and managing a media server for my family that hosts pictures and other things. If those 3 things can be done easily without issue on a Linux distro without having to fuck around with configs every time I want to do something, I’m all in. By what I’ve heard though it’s just not there yet. I am super happy Steam decided to go Linux for their Steamdeck though as I’ve heard thats helped make monumental strides the right direction. Trust me, I want to. Large part of it is I worked tech support for over a decade and having to troubleshoot my own shit is like the furthest thing I want to deal with haha

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Just going to say, I do those things too, on Linux, and while I can’t say I never have to mess with config files, it’s not frequent. And, the computer acting like it’s my computer rather than on loan from a megacorp is nice.

It’s not all the way there yet but it’s so very close and the bits that are still pain points aren’t nearly as bad as the pain points of Windows.

As the other commenter said, you should give it a serious try. Mint is very smooth overall.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You owe it to yourself to try it out! I recommend dual booting into Linux Mint Cinnamon for a while and have your windows install to fall back on to. That or one of the gaming-specific distributions, but from what I’ve seen Mint does all with gaming too. It’s a good all-around starting place, and there are a lot of resources because it’s popular and built off of the most popular distro. I installed it on my work machine (software engineering) and I’ve felt no lack of capability or a need to switch to a more “hardcore” distro.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Hey I will give my anecdotal recent experience. Several months ago I switched to Pop! OS and have had basically no issues. I have an Nvidia GPU and I play a lot of games. I don’t play any games that are blocked by anti cheat (not because I can’t, I just don’t happen to play the few that are blocked).

I spent the first day getting everything signed in, installed, set up and tweaked to how I like it with very minimal terminal usage. Mostly gui and clicking.

Steam+Proton along with lutris makes it easy to play any game for me.

Side note: I have 4 monitors of varying resolution, size, orientation and refresh rate and it hasn’t caused problems other than the initial setup (I used cursr to help with this)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If you can live without games having invasive anticheat, then everything should be doable, and probably a lot easier than in Windows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Microsoft is waaay easier to avoid than fucking google. Is one drive that annoying?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I feel like Trump’s probably going to axe whoever is finally tackling these monopolies, unfortunately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

What changed with OneDrive? I’m genuinely interested because I’m a user and haven’t noticed anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

On corp side and personal if you don’t have One Drive setup MS will spam notifications to set it up, and when you go to save will try to default to One Drive as opposed to local.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.8K

    Posts

  • 155K

    Comments