Scott Pelley recapped the Cabinet picks of President-elect Donald Trump in the “60 Minutes” opening Sunday, enraging MAGA supporters despite the segment’s recitation of facts. (Watch the video below.)

The summary “is exactly why no one respects the legacy media anymore,” one person complained on X, formerly Twitter.

“Pure Democratic propaganda,” griped another.

Pelley, a correspondent, began by noting “some nominees appear to have no compelling qualifications other than loyalty to Trump.”

He pointed out defense secretary nominee Pete Hegseth’s lack of government experience and recent gig as a Fox News morning host; the investigation into attorney general nominee Matt Gaetz’s alleged sex with a minor; and the vaccine skepticism of health and human services nominee Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

“It’s up to the new Republican majority in the Senate to decide whether these nominees are equipped to represent the American people,” Pelley concluded.

-28 points

Huffpost basically just platforming the worst opinions available. Thanks dumbasses.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

everyone knows maga opinions are stupid and useless. that doesn’t take away from the enjoyment of watching them whine about everything under the sun

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

The resistance:

watching them whine

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Not necessarily a bad thing.

If reporting on it makes moderate conservatives embarrassed to be associated with MAGA conservatives, they’re helping to create a divide and start infighting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m probably never going to like fluff pieces or opinion-based news so let’s just leave it at that. Hope you’re right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You’re right. Using Twitter quotes as a source of news is journalistic malpractice. They’re just lazily pushing out dumb articles that are only popular because they confirm your priors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

None of us have our hearts in our work these days, but I’d be fired for this level of faking it

permalink
report
parent
reply
132 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
26 points

4 years… at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points
*

4 more years of this. donvict’s bastardization of the slogan dates back to december 2011.

the far right whining about the ‘liberal’ media goes back a lot earlier than that

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Four more years, with many more to come.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This part is actually kind of wild. For a people who idolize “strong men” to such a degree, the amount of crying they do is absurd.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Only 4? God I wish I had your optimism

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Thanks, Merrick Garland. Way to let a guy credibly accused of like 6 different Federal crimes (including a whole ass coup) just walk by slow walking investigations because you didn’t want to look political.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Don’t worry, it’s all gonna be fine. Joe Biden shook hands with Trump at White House last week.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

4 years of “you’ll never believe what we’ve found on twitter” journalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
240 points

Why are we accepting reporting on tweets as a journalism?

Yeah MAGA reacted to the 60 minutes, but so what? One can find similar reactions on any topic, there’s nothing new that we learn by reading this. It just manufacturers outrage on the other side.

permalink
report
reply
44 points

Twitter is the official mouthpiece of the trump administration though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Seems to be the mouthpiece of anyone trying to argue anything nowadays. you can always find a tweet supporting any argument you wanna make.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s the whole point: Bread & Circuses, Part Duh©

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

For now. It will be state sponsored media shortly

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Right. Cherry-picking kool-aid enthusiasts spreading their knee-jerk reaction on social media isn’t journalism. These people are likely not valid representatives of public MAGA opinion, to say the least.

The anti-mainstream media comment in particular turns this whole post so many levels of irony that it’s actually challenging to unpack it in a succinct way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They barely reacted. These maga types aren’t going to watch some video critical of their beliefs which are more akin to religious than political these days

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Huffington Post is has been clickbait trash for a while now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Then stop upvoting this stuff! During election time every damn article upvoted here was about i.) horse race reporting or ii.) Trump outrage. We have to stop clicking these links and sharing the articles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

This could very well be one of the first times a large swath of cable tv viewers and MAGA heard about Gaetz allegations of giving hardcore drugs to child prostitutes, so seeing their reaponse is interesting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

MAGA people avoid all mainstream media except 60 minutes on CBS?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

A large number of Americans prefer to get news from Cable TV. Especially the elderly and poor.

The biggest cable news network by a huge margin is Fox News with more than double the second place, MSNBC, views.

CBS isn’t on Cable, it is a Broadcast TV network but it is among the highest rated broadcast channels, even higher than Fox News, due to CBS also covering sports.

So while CBS is less popular as a news network, 60 Minutes is the most popular News Program in the USA.

In 2013 Pew Research said “About one- quarter of American adults, (24%) watch only Fox News, 23% watch only CNN and 15% watch only MSNBC.”

And here’s some additional graphs for further enrichment of your contextual info

You’re welcome for the free sociology lesson.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Lol their feelings don’t care about your facts

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I want to agree, but there is something to be said about the influence of social media on an average person. One reason I was really anxious about the election was whenever I saw shitload of likes on tweets that were straight up lies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The problem with this garbage type of reporting is that you can create any narrative you want. Social media is so big that it’s not hard to find a handful of posts, like what is being posted in their story, saying almost anything you need them to. Always going to be some insane person in some corner of the internet saying something completely batshit.

The article is really “we found some people on social media saying these things” and it’s being framed as “maga meltdown.” It’s fucking garbage.

I agree that social media has a large influence, but how does garbage journalism like this do anything other than add more fuel to the fire of “traditional media is now trash”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oooh, i misunderstood you at first. I 100% agree, I have unsubbed from some subreddits before because they kept posting tweets of “haters” as if that’s noteworthy in any way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Why are we accepting reporting on tweets as a journalism?

Are we? It’s on huffpost.com. Since when is that journalism?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Whooo boy, let me introduce you to gaming and popular culture ‘journalism’, where these ‘journalists’ do almost nothing other than write op eds about the vibes they’re getting from Twitter in the past 48 hrs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Wake me up when they actually melt.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

The glaciers are going to melt loooooooooong before the MAGA cult will.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Well, looks like it is already starting. I fully expected the donvict fans to get even angrier if he won. Just like last time.

I think part of it is that they are now also having conversations in their lives where normal Americans are just fucking done with them. Just because they are enthusiastic about donvict, and gleefully voted for him over the objections of those around them, doesn’t mean they are going to just roll with it, and still be friends, lovers, relatives, because “it’s just politics”. Some people are just getting cut off:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/man-left-speechless-as-wife-files-for-divorce-after-he-voted-for-donald-trump/ar-AA1tX4kp

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 215K

    Comments