National Review isn’t a reliable “news” source. It’s more like a version of the old supermarket crap like the The Enquirer, only with a politics lean instead of People Magazine lean.
Why can’t we have nice things man
Just a reminder that the national review is a garbage rag and a biased source.
The judge had questions about the process used to decide the onion had won, and reviewed the information. That’s not the same as blocking the sale.
A hearing is normal after the sale of assets, and the people making the claim that it’s not are the other buyer, which is … Alex Jones.
Jones was accused of peddling the narrative that the shooting, in which a gunman killed 20 first-grade students and six teachers twelve years ago, was a massive hoax designed to get federal gun-control legislation enacted. The plaintiffs alleged Jones defamed them on his show and inflicted emotional distress.
That’s a very slanted way to say “Jones was convicted of defamation and inflicting emotional distress on the families of a school shooting by insisting their children weren’t real”.
https://apnews.com/article/alex-jones-infowars-auction-onion-how-d42e7b2c916205b348628686c8b8dd4a
https://bsky.app/profile/bencollins.bsky.social/post/3lb3hecp7l22k
That judge sounds butthurt. I wonder who appointed him….
Well well well he was appointed by Carl E Stewart who was appointed by Slick Willy. Not what I expected.
Man, the onion buying infowars was the one good news story this entire month… of course we can’t even have that
