113 points

Kamala raised over $1 billion dollars for her campaign, most of which was from small donors.

If that doesn’t tell the Dems they don’t need oligarch money, nothing will.

permalink
report
reply
57 points

They know that. Problem is the WANT billionaires money too ^^

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Then they spent it on high per hour political consultants who paid Beyonce to perform

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Except Beyonce literally didn’t perform for Harris?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Oh. I heard Oprah got a mil, but that could be fake

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

That’s a mere pittance compared to what the wealthy actually spend on conservatives and messaging. That’s 1 billion dollars every 4 years. Fox news, daily wire, OANN, and all the myriad of other propaganda outlets churn through more than that a year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Yes, but we’re not talking about conservatives.

The Democratic party has a problem, and that problem is what Democratic voters want doesn’t align with what Democratic donors want. The voters want progressive policies passed, while the donors want the same neoliberalism that keeps them rich. And trying to appease one of those groups obviously alienates the other.

If any Democratic politician truly wants to help the American population, the fact that Kamala raised so much money in such a short amount of time, and the fact that many states passed progressive policies even though they voted for Trump, should tell them that they don’t need to kowtow to the wealthy because the voters will support them. Unfortunately, I don’t think they’re going to learn that lesson.

Republicans, of course, don’t have this problem because their voters and their donors all want the same thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The whole point of this was asking why Democrats are catering to wealthy conservative donors instead of progressive or left leaning voters. I just stated the reason why. The 1 billion dollars collected from small donors every four years for a presidential run is nice. But it’s nothing compared to what the wealthy dump into messaging and campaigning constantly. Until such time as small donors can even come close to remotely matching that. Sustaining entire media Outlet ecosystems to counter the propaganda from conservatives. Democrats aren’t going to give up trying to get some of that wealthy conservative money

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

What happens to the amount they didn’t spend?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

they’re in debt

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Maybe if they go bankrupt we can start a new party that cares what its voters think and doesnt shit the bed so often.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

X for doubt on that. Im sure they’ve said that though. That’s a lot of really expensive campaign parties for a three month run

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Really awesome point! I hope that becomes apparent to them

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Narrator: It didn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

It was celebrity money, you know, the same people that were telling people they were “just like them.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Like that’ll ever happen.

The party is held by a group of political elites who are all about the establishment and power.

There needs to be a new party, a labor party, to represent the working class Americans.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

I agree.
I voted for Harris because Dems are supposed to be the establishment. Supposed to be a return normal boring politics.

That’s obviously not going to work. Now we need an actual working class, under a few million dollar a year takehome party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It would be easier for progressives to take over the DNC and state Dems than to form an entirely new party and make it viable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points
*

Going further right didn’t help, now we need to go as left as possible

Radical ideas like Universal healthcare, paid maternity leave, free child care, taxing the rich.

permalink
report
reply
39 points

Radical ideas the rest of the 1st world had had for 50 years and successfully implemented.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points
*

I instead see them not learning a damn thing and putting up Nancy Pelosi as the Presidential candidate for 2028.

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Will she achieve lichdom in time?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Acting as if she hasn’t already! There’s a reason that dude went after her husband with a hammer and not her. He knew better than to mess with a lich.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Or Manchin or Sinema or Liz Cheney.

In all honesty, Newsom is probably the candidate the party leadershit has already selected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Wow, if only there had been an anti establishment candidate running for president as a democrat in 2016… too bad…

permalink
report
reply
-4 points

Yeah if only he hadn’t lost the popular vote TWICE in the primaries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If only the popular vote in the Democratic primaries meant anything at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

The delegates too. But are you just gonna ignore MORE people voted Hillary and Biden over him to fit your narative?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 190K

    Comments