Summary

Donald Trump has pledged to end birthright citizenship through an executive order if re-elected, targeting the 14th Amendment’s provision that grants citizenship to all born in the U.S.

Critics argue this policy would defy the Constitution, specifically its post-Civil War intent to ensure citizenship for former slaves.

Legal experts widely agree that the Amendment’s language includes children born to undocumented parents, but Trump’s proposal could lead to an immediate legal battle.

The policy would require federal agencies to verify parents’ immigration status, complicating access to Social Security numbers and passports for U.S.-born children.

-42 points

Unpopular opinion here, perhaps, but I don’t see the logic of birthright citizenship beyond its original intent of granting citizenship to former slaves. I actually think ending it might help some of the border crisis stuff. What other countries have it? The idea that at least one parent needs to be a citizen does not sound insane to me.

I think adding a legal unskilled temporary worker status might also mitigate the humanitarian issues.

What am I missing?

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

Cool, you still can’t override a constitutional amendment via executive order if you want to pretend that law matters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No, but the Supreme Court can by “reinterpreting” the Amendment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It looks like much of the Western Hemisphere has jus soli. A quick search says:

  • Colombia
  • Peru
  • Venezuela
  • Ecuador
  • Paraguay
  • Canada
  • Mexico
  • Argentina
  • Brazil
  • Chile
  • Uruguay

What I can’t say is whether, with the exception of Canada and the U.S., that has any impact on the immigration of those countries. I will cop to ignorance, but many of those countries don’t seem like they would be a big step up in the world for most people.

I have a friend from Brazil. I don’t think he’d recommend being from Brazil. He moved to Portugal.

I know basically nothing about any of those countries other than having vacationed in Mexico twice. I haven’t seen anyone say they are fed up with the U.S. and moving to Paraguay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I know basically nothing about any of those countries other than having vacationed in Mexico twice. I haven’t seen anyone say they are fed up with the U.S. and moving to Paraguay.

Note: Mexicans have been emigrating out of USA for about a full decade now.

So statistically speaking, Mexicans have been saying they’re tired of USA and have moved back to Mexico.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

English common law: a citizen is born in a land and that land was owned by a king. As such, the citizen and the land are like one. Citizens based upon birth are owed protection by the local king, while the local king is owed the work of said citizens.

The tradition of birthright citizenship is far older than the 14th Amendment. People were arguing about this crap in the middle ages.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

What other countries have it?

Countries influenced by English common law, so nearly every country in North and South America, Australia, and Europe.

You can’t possibly see the downside of people being born in your country but not having the same rights as citizens? What makes you think slavery wouldn’t return if it were ended?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

To be fair, it’s only the countries in dark blue on that map that have it. The light blue countries have something like one of your parents has to be a citizen/settled, which is what the previous commenter was suggesting as an alternative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Thank you

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

the border crisis stuff

What “border crisis stuff”? There are no massive groups of people crossing the border illegally, all of the talk about that is GOP propaganda.

The majority of illegal immigrants in the US enter the country legally and then overstay their visas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not exactly. The current majority are claiming asylum at the border and then get lost in the system, no-showing court dates, etc. That’s why the border bill this year had provisions for more judges to expedite the process.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m 100% for humanitarian alternatives to help people whose countries are not safe. Full stop.

I’m not sure that it’s fair to handwave away the idea that there’s a crisis as GOP propaganda when both Obama and Trump called it one. I don’t think it’s fair to say that there’s no massive groups coming when between 2021 and 2024 7.2 million migrants were encountered by border officials, and that number does not include migrants who successfully made it through. And Biden deported more migrants in 3 years than Trump did in 4.

I don’t claim to be an expert on this topic by any means. I am open to other ideas. But there is, I think, a valid issue here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico–United_States_border_crisis?wprov=sfla1

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The only “crisis” is racists and xenophobes getting their testes in a twist about becoming a minority race and maybe having to learn a second language. People traveling hundreds of miles just to come here and commit crimes is a stupid argument for stupid people. The stats also don’t hold up as far as crime goes. They’re much less likely to commit crimes over fear of deportation. And all of the actual drug dealers that enter the country illegally will probably be back in the US in under a month of being deported.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You should really read up on things like H1B visas then. They were for skilled workers and still got abused in a variety of ways including to suppress wages and get more or less indentured workers. I know places like GameStop loved them because the person would basically forfeit their visas if they quit so could abuse them more than a regular worker.

The more power an employer has over a worker and the less rights people who live in the country have, the worse it will be in general.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Hospitals abuse the fuck out of H1B visas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I will do some reading then, thanks

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

First off it really really fucking sucks to be stateless.

Secondly, if you grew up in America and got an American education, you’re American enough for me. We’ve invested a big chunk of money into training you so it’d be swell if you’d put that education to use in the American economy.

Lastly, as one of the favorite shirts on res points out - why the fuck do you assume you’re American anyways:

Original Homeland Security

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Honest question, do most countries in the Americas withhold citizenship from children born to citizens of that country who happen to be abroad? I’m just trying to understand how big the stateless thing would be

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

He only wants to get rid of Leon.

permalink
report
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

So he wants to increase the work done in the central government, therefor increasing spending and therfore taxes?

Edit: /s

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

No dude, he’s going to fire most federal workers. He will replace some of them with sycophants . Read Project 2025

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Dude wants to help Musk become president.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 189K

    Comments