47 points

In Interstellar movie I almost had a syncope when Dr. Romilly explains how a wormhole works to Cooper as if he were a 5-year-old child and not a former NASA astronaut.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

I have been in the room where seasoned doctors are talking to junior doctors like this, I think its normal. Sometimes people that are really smart can dumb down their subject of expertise in a way that an outsider might seem like they are talking down to someone

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

i think it’s partly because it’s often very easy for experts to overestimate what non-experts know, even people with some knowledge in the field (relevant xkcd as usual), so it’s probably easier to just dumb it down as much as you possibly can. That way you’re sure most people can actually understand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

There’s probably an explaining shit to the expert TV Tropes page.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I’d look for it, but I wouldn’t be able to escape the gravitational pull of that site for several days…

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

She was actually explaining it to the movie going audience, in a break of the fourth wall indirectly, but y’know

;)

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

syncope

You’re not going to believe the name of Christopher Nolan’s production company.

Syncopy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Do NASA astronauts have a course on wormholes? You know… just in case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I was a former 5-year-old child.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

“Libera te tutemet ex inferis.”

permalink
report
reply
19 points

where we’re going, we wont need eyes to meme

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Will the mirrors be real?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

How Can Mirrors Be Real If Our Eyes Aren’t Real?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

It’s cute how humans always think they are capable of explaining such things as these.

I 100% support theoretical investigation, and the pursuit of scientific examination… But we don’t KNOW a whole lot about wormholes. We can only GUESS based on visual evidence.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

What visual evidence of wormholes? If I’m not mistaken, they’re purely theoretical objects at this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

If we’re really being pedantic, that’s technically true about everything. For all you know you’re hallucinating me right now

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I knew it!

I am the Boltzmann brain!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No, it’s different. With you, there’s at least something that we observe that we might be hallucinating.

With worm holes, we’re taking mathematical equations that were modelled to reflect what we’ve observed of reality and then we’re pushing them to extreme cases where they’re likely to not anymore model reality correctly, and that is where we’re seeing the theoretical possibility of worm holes. No one has observed nor hallucinated worm holes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Thanks, Stargate & Stranger Things!

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Pretty sure this explanation came from Event Horizon first.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

More like A Wrinkle in Time, the 1962 book

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Alas, I have not read that book.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It is by no means an exhaustive list. Those are just the ones that sprang to mind.

I wonder if anyone has posted a supercut of this trope on YouTube…

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I think remembering that, at least in movies, it originated with Event Horizon is critical because it is the only one that takes into account any downside to transdimensional travel…and what a downside it was.

I will always mourn the loss of any possible director’s cut of Event Horizon where the footage was so insanely over the top that the execs almost shit their pants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I don’t like this explanation, because if you don’t know what wormholes are before, you might think wormoles are represented by the hole stabbed through the paper by the pencil.

Correctly stretching the paper to make a 2D wormhole is hard, but maybe you should just use a bagel or something

permalink
report
reply
9 points

People are supposed to include the fact that the pencil can go through because (layman terminology abuse ahead) of the “shape” the space-time topology is presenting (or I guess being induced to present as, if Sci-fi hypothetical) before you get to the explanation of the pencil as craft/observer and how the hole is how that shortened path through the wormhole appears from frames of reference not the pencil.

I like the bagel idea but then you have to hold it all horizontal while explaining so they don’t see the hole too early and you’re then just left intently staring at your audience across a bagel held at eye height like a slowly hungering loon. Or so I’ve heard.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.2K

    Posts

  • 51K

    Comments