Summary

Conservative economist Oren Cass warns that Donald Trump could jeopardize his presidency by focusing on donor and activist agendas rather than the priorities of swing voters who secured his victory.

Writing in The New York Times, Cass argues that new presidents often mistake donor interests, such as tax cuts and deregulation, for the will of the electorate, leading to ineffective governance and loss of public trust.

Cass urges Trump to prioritize issues that resonate with the broader American public to avoid a fate that has derailed past presidencies.

54 points

Economists also said that Trump would tank the economy. Americans sleep.

Maybe if dear leader has his interests threatened people will listen.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Economists also said that Trump would tank the economy. Americans sleep.

Not even just “sleeping”, Wallstreet is celebrating his win!

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Because his tax cuts and numerous policies will facilitate an even greater transfer of wealth to the richest 1%.

They can commit all crimes harder and simply blame immigrants or the left while they throw shit at the fan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Because like the recession in 08, everyone’s hoping they can buy the dip and sell before everything goes kaboom.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Why would he care? He can’t get elected again. He’s probably not even going to be alive many more years (or at least not mentally aware of anything)

permalink
report
reply
18 points

I’m sure his Supreme Court would be happy to rule the constitution unconstitutional.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

As much power as they have, they can’t do that fortunately. So, they’ll need to get creative. Something along the lines of “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice” really means twice consecutively, so a third term is good to go. As flippant as I sound about it, it is actually a possibility if Trump survives that long and wants to run again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I mean, what actually stops them? Like, if they just came out and said verbatim “yeah, we dont care about the constitution anymore, republican presidents can do whatever they want” word for word as their ruling, and the president and congress are occupied by republicans with no desire to impeach them for it or refuse to enforce the ruling, what do you suppose happens?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

“It’s not enforceable” just like the 14th amendment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oh if they did I’d love to see Obama throw his hat in the ring.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because the cons are “originalists”, lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

He can’t get elected again

He’s going to start talking about a third term within a month of taking office. At first they’re going to write it off as “jokes” and then he’s going to push it to the supreme court.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Something something it’s constitutional because democrat FDR and the first term didn’t count because we didn’t get to hang Mike Pence.

/s but not really

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Am I the only person in the world that heard him say many times that if you vote for him you’ll never have to vote again? I feel like I’m going fucking crazy here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Yes. He said it and he meant it.

At least ~70 million people are actually mentally ill. Don’t bother trying to rationalize their actions because that will make you insane.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It scares me the way his base ate it up. What is wrong with people that they don’t appreciate living in a modern democracy. Its just crazy to think of living before world war one compared to were we are at now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh he did. My only hope at this point is that he is just so self-centered he meant he didn’t care about their voting anymore because he personally could never run again.

At least from a personal perspective, I wouldn’t be surprised if he would be ok with closing his legacy having “won the game” by serving as president as long as he was allowed to serve with an overwhelming electoral victory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

HahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahHahahah

There’s no “could” about it.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

In the same way that “every accusation is a confession” with conservatives, I just assume that all of Trump potential “downfalls” are just slight inconveniences at most.

permalink
report
reply
91 points

If the last few years have taught me anything, it’s that what you do is not important as much as the narrative that you are able to spin.

As long as TV news networks, podcasters, news outlets, and Musk’s Twitter exist, people who are too ignorant to understand they are being lied to, or too lazy to parse credible information, will stay in the dark and vote red in the next election as well.
Democracy doesn’t work when the electorate is too illiterate to cast their vote justly. They’ll just vote for the next clown who promises them the moon.

I don’t have a solution.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Exactly.

I’ve had Republican friends send me articles, I read them, start the debate, only to realize they literally only read the headline.

I’ve found myself reading terribly written articles just so that I’m sure I don’t misunderstand anything being portrayed in the article. Sometimes spending an extra 20-30 additional minutes for fact checking.

Trying to have a subsequent conversation with them is like pissing in the wind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I really enjoyed explaining to a friend that the headline about outlawing child genital mutilation was referring to circumcision.

…that was sarcasm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well, if goods become even more expensive, and wages fail to improve or get worse, then people tend to notice that more than the spin.

Sure you have very loud passionate politically active people who are game for “their team” to win no matter what and will listen to anything to rationalize their position and reject anything that disagrees, but a lot of folks are just looking at their personal circumstance and deciding if they think it’s bad or not and voting either to continue or change, without a whole lot of consideration of what either side says will work or why things are the way they are, they just know “keep it going” or “change it out”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We need never be afraid of the vote of informed Americans. It is only the ignorant voter we have to fear, ignorant politically, no matter how fine his house or how expensive his schooling. Such people have never experienced democracy; they have merely enjoyed its benefits. It is hard to explain what democracy is; it is necessary to participate in it to understand it.

—Robert A. Heinlein, Take Back Your Government

Unfortunately, there seems to be an awful lot of ignorance out there today.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 188K

    Comments