2 points

Is this finally the dusk of SO? It helps alot, but also suck alot.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Honestly SO fuelled the rise of the cut and paste developer. I won’t be that sad to see the end of it, and the LLMs that scraped it soon after.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You are also underestimating how sites like SO really helped a new generation of programmers learn. Anyone could search and learn things, whether to take a serious approach or just for a bit of fun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Before they pulled up the ladder. There is NOTHING more frustrating than looking up a problem, getting the exact question you are looking for, only for the answers to say the question is locked and given a link to another malformed question which tell you to rtfm, and that this is no longer supported., try to do something else with a completely different software in a completely different way. All in an attempt to keep the question pool pure. I do not mourn SO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think you’re underestimating how badly it taught them. I see a lot of developers (when interviewing) that are unable to reason about code.

Lot’s of people learn how to cook by following recipes, but they don’t try to get work in catering or running restaurants. That requires a different level of understanding.

SO was the coding recipe book. It was fine for hobbyists. Not professionals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The amount of people I’ve been helping out that have copied some code from somewhere and say “it doesn’t work”, and who are dumbfounded when I ask them to read the surrounding text aloud for me…

Along the same line: When something crashes, and all I have to do is tell people to read the error message aloud, and ask them what that means. It’s like so many people expect to be spoon-fed solutions, to the point where they don’t even stop to think about the problem if something doesn’t immediately work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
103 points

It will recover when AI learns sneering condescension.

permalink
report
reply
83 points
*

Wonder where chatgpt will get its training data in the future, as it’s known not to extrapolate well. Where will it learn new frameworks, languages, … from?

permalink
report
reply
52 points

Its going to starve itself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Let it die

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

A lot of models are being trained on “synthetic” data now, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Armies on paid personal generating content?

I see absolutely no problem with that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Even when a parrot learns to parrot a parrot, the first parrot still has to be taught.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

The docs. It’s what it does now a lot of the time I’ve noticed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Auto generated docs since devs don’t document?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Chatgpt, look at this repo and write docs

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah the smaller the project the less effective this is.

But even learning from the source code is pretty effective.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That works when the docs are good and clear. Otherwise, we’ll have to revert to communicating with each other for brief periods while the chat-bots train themselves on the new data.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

I doubt it ever scraped SO, otherwise all the answers would be smth along the lines: “I cannot answer this question due to low quality effort!” closes browser window

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The documentation?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I’m raising their traffic,by slowly poisoning my answers & questions.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Why would you want to also make Stack Overflow worse?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I didn’t consent to ChatGPT using my stuff. So they get 💩.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

But so do the Stack Overflow users

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wut. You consented to CC BY-SA. That’s consenting to everyone using your work, including for profit companies and nonprofits. This is a good thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Chat GPT is wonderful as a search engine for SO. It regurgitates the answers in a format easier to incorporate into your own project.

The thing I’m worried about is a lack of new answers. You need data to train an LLM, what to do if nobody is producing it?

permalink
report
reply
2 points

It already uses the docs and API references

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I typically visit stack overflow when encountering edge cases and bugs not covered by the documentation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If it has learned from the source code you’d be surprised how good it is at that as well.

For docs it’s better, for other stuff it’s way worse than a human.

It’s a shame so much stuff is locked up in discord these days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

But who writes the docs now

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Ha! I have an AI for that! Gotcha!

On, but the AI trains now on other docs that I used an AI to write…

Oh shit…

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.1K

    Posts

  • 131K

    Comments