220 points

This graph is misinformation

Although we have seen a small decline in traffic, in no way is it what the graph is showing (which some have incorrectly interpreted to be a 50% or 35% decrease). This year [2023], overall, we’re seeing an average of ~5% less traffic compared to 2022.

Original comment by jo3rn@discuss.tchnics.de

permalink
report
reply
53 points

And yet they didn’t show us a rectified or accurate graph.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They’re lying

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Says who? ChatGPT?

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points
*

ChatGPT is lying too, and is also really confident about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Says corporations trying to protect their investment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Is this a facts or feelings response?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Is this a trust a company to announce it’s dying response?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You got evidence for that bold statement, ooooor

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

An ML trusting a corporation, orrrr?

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

The irony of it all is SO making deals for AI to scrape their site for machine learning but in doing so more people are using chatgpt and copilot more because it’s easier and just as accurate. AI/ML is really going to destroy these websites and yet it’s the websites signing off on their own death sentences.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

I think they see the writing on the wall and they’re trying to make a buck while they still can.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

It’s called selling out. I doubt they have any illusions about the future of these platforms, they just don’t care as long as they can cash out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

What I’m still not sure of is this… When these websites die will the LLMs stagnate with no new data to use for training or will they somehow keep up with new technology and eliminate the need for certain basic questions that would originally have required human input?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The ideal result? LLMs are just early versions of much better things that come later.

The unlikely result: we develop a separate human curated internet somewhere, complete with verification that a human wrote every bit. Basically verifiable digital id and signing on everything. Maybe.

The probable result: the internet turns to shit as AIs are trained on content created by AIs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Down voted. If you’re just going to post a screenshot, you must include a link to the source. This is a link sharing platform.

permalink
report
reply
11 points
6 points

I thought I was going to be rickrolled but this is better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

Closed as duplicate

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Now that’s just a signal for training reinforcement

permalink
report
parent
reply
102 points

It will recover when AI learns sneering condescension.

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 6K

    Posts

  • 129K

    Comments