cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/151111

With the dust is settling from their defeat on Tuesday, it’s becoming clearer that there was some incredible malpractice going on in the Democratic party. As shown in the tweet I linked, Biden delayed dropping out even though his team knew it was going to be a complete blowout for Trump. Then, we have Harris’s campaign spending over a billion dollars and still losing all of the swing states she needed to win.

For all the Democrats who would never vote Republican and would have never voted third party, are you now considering voting third party in future elections? If not, what would it take?

31 points

If not, what would it take?

A viable third party candidate. Before anyone says it, Jill Stein is not it. Alternately, a voting method that allows voting third party without just enabling a GOP sweep (again).

It’d be great if this resulted in some major revision of the Democratic party from within, but I’m not holding my breath. I will, however, continue voting for the “less bad viable option” if the “more bad option” is on par with Trump.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

That’s fair, but if the Democrats are also running candidates that aren’t viable or not running viable campaigns, then you’re just compromising your principles for nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s self-defeating nonsense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It was actually self-defeating to run on a platform that got an (enthusiastically received) endorsement from Dick Cheney.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

It’s about who has a chance of winning. If you’re trying to argue that any candidate other than Harris had a chance of beating Trump in this recent election, you’re kidding yourself.

I’ve said this before and I’ll continue saying it: Trying to inject a 3rd party candidate into the presidential race is foolish. A much better tactic would be trying to push for 3rd party candidates in smaller races for local / state government, or congress. Doing that is a lot easier, and can make small incremental changes that add up over time. There simply isn’t a realistic way for a third party candidate to compete in the presidential race until the voting system is changed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Sanders and Stein would have won.

Harris never had a chance of winning. Running a far right cop for the party that is opposed to far right cops is the dumbest possible fucking move.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If you’re trying to argue that any candidate other than Harris had a chance of beating Trump in this recent election, you’re kidding yourself.

I’m not trying to argue that. I’m saying that it’s becoming apparent that the Democratic party is in such bad shape that they had no chance to beat Trump either. If they fail to make significant changes, to their personnel and their platform, they are going to keep failing in subsequent elections. If they’re going to lose anyway, then there’s got to be a point where progressive Democrats start voting with some dignity for third party candidates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

A decent human being doesn’t vote for the most principled candidate, they instead vote for the candidate who would hurt the fewest number of people by winning while (importantly) actually having a chance of winning.

Moral absolutism isn’t moral, it results in people getting hurt, because whoever adheres to it decided for themsevles that their principles are more important than fellow human beings. The sooner you realize this, the better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I will never vote for genocide, turns out there’s at least 15 million like me. You enjoy being responsible for this genocide and any expansion of it Trump does, as you voted for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My question isn’t about morality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

A truly progressive third party that also actually has a prayer of winning. They would need a groundswell of individual small donors making up much of their campaign funding because mainstream ain’t gonna fund them, so good luck with that.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Despite a billion dollars in funding, the Democrats campaign didn’t have a prayer either. And I have a hard time calling their platform progressive at all. Anyone who liked it more than that of the Greens or the PSL would have just voted Republican.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This is like survivor bias.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m not sure what you mean. We’re looking at the wreckage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

You’re ignoring the “prayer of winning” part. Until then, I’m voting against the bigger asshole.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yes, but as it turned out, Harris didn’t have a prayer either. If you weren’t voting for Trump (I assume you consider him to be the bigger asshole) it didn’t matter if you voted for Harris or any other candidate. So unless the Democrats make big changes to their platform and the people running their campaigns… well, it’s insanity to expect a different result. There’s got to be a point where progressive Democrats decide that they might as well vote with some dignity for third party candidates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So, the green party. Good thing a bunch of far right idiots didn’t spend the last 8 years implying a licensed medical doctor at the head of the party was a Russian spy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I wrote her off many years ago for reasons I don’t remember, but know had nothing to do with that. Also, COVID proved being a licensed MD isn’t a reliable yardstick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You could run a modern campaign with nothing but social media memes and volunteers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Bernie Sanders did that, and it did great. It wasn’t enough to win, partly because the Democrats fucked him.

At this point, you’ll have to contend with massive social-media operations which are working against and shaping the narratives that most of the country use as a substitute for news, to understand what’s happening in the world. I think the time to be able to do it has passed, for a little while, without on-the-ground anti-electoral organizing on a massive scale.

See who you can find in your area. It’s about to get real, I think.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Lemmy, 1 week ago: “A THIRD PARTY VOTE IS A REPUBLICAN VOTE!”

Lemmy, today: “WE SHOULD ALL BE VOTING THIRD PARTY!”

permalink
report
reply
5 points

The responses I’ve been getting so far don’t seem very warm to third party voting at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s not the Democratic Party is going to learn anything from this. Might as well set that bitch on fire and try to get something else going.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

A week ago, a third party vote for president was a vote for Trump.

The presidential election is over. Now is the time to rejigger the political gameboard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I will be back to comment on this thread in 4 years, when unimaginative US libs are saying the same exact thing to try to goad others into a Democrat vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

Ranked choice voting or similar.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

This is the realistic answer. First past the post voting inherently results in two dominant parties.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m vastly more in favor of Approval Voting, truth be told. Most anything’s better than what we have now, but ranked voting systems of any sort tend to have issues similar to FPTP, whereas Approval or Score voting don’t. Approval Voting is also dead simple, since the only change is that you can vote for as many candidates as you want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Sanders got fucked in 2016 and the Democrats who get nominated aren’t great and yes it’s partially the Democrats’ fault they got so few votes in 2024. I strongly disagree that it’s chiefly their fault, but that horse is out of the barn now, and also the barn is on fire now and connected to the house with the children inside.

There will be some incredible shit going down in the next few years. It’ll be a challenge to have any sort of elections in 2028 that have anything non-Republican in any position to win anything. I don’t think it will happen.

If you want to have a conversation about how we get left-wing values to win in future elections, start with how we fight to preserve basic freedoms like elections that don’t have Trump’s election integrity squad in charge of them, and free speech online, and the military not being used against American protestors.

I hope I’m wrong but I think some real shit is going to go down real soon. I don’t think we should assume elections are going to be normal and then plan from that assumption.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

If left-wing values can’t win in 2028 it will be because the Democratic candidate runs as a knock-off Republican again, which isn’t going to win either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Give it a rest. I can argue back my point of view to you, and we can go back and forth a little, and it’s pointless.

I can guarantee you that people in large numbers will get their doors kicked in by the police and hauled away, and laws will get passed that make it a crime to be anti-Republican. How wide a scale and how bad that all will get isn’t certain, but I think it will be pretty bad.

Your days of pointing at the Democrats as the problem need to stop, and their days of pointing at the Bernie Sanders crowd and the Palestine protestors as the problem need to stop, because even if we (edit: don’t) do put all that bullshit aside and start fighting together against the real enemy for real, we might not win. I really don’t care who’s right anymore. Before the election, I did. That stuff is over.

The more people who are still convinced that their own side needs to be made into the enemy in any respect, the harder that fight will get, and it’ll already be hard, and bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I can guarantee you that people in large numbers will get their doors kicked in by the police and hauled away, and laws will get passed that make it a crime to be anti-Republican. How wide a scale and how bad that all will get isn’t certain, but I think it will be pretty bad.

If you can better define and quantify your expectations, I might be willing to take the other side of that bet.

permalink
report
parent
reply

U.S. News

!usnews@beehaw.org

Create post

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what’s functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.


Guidelines for submissions:
  • Post the original source of information as the link.
  • If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
  • Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
  • Social media is not a news source.

For World News, see the News community.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 358

    Monthly active users

  • 260

    Posts

  • 168

    Comments