237 points

And now we watch as Christians vote to destroy God’s creation in order to drive vroomier pick-up shit wagons.

permalink
report
reply
54 points

Their goal is to bring about the end of days so that they can all be saved and go to heaven. They are literally trying to end the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

This is not an exaggeration. They literally don’t care about the world because “we’re all going to heaven anyway.” I have relatives that have said as much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Like sometimes I can envy the people who believe this shit, how simple a life you must live… So carefree and understanding of others, to let people live their own lives how they want knowing in the end we all get to go to some magical place forever…

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

This reason is why I laugh about Israel lining up behind the American right wing. Like you guys know what Israel is for according to the bible, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I have no clue, because never reading the bible thoroughly because of being an atheist and all. I did a quick search and found something about being model nation under god and fully embracing the Messiah as a nation. But not sure what you refer to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I kind of advocate sending them to heaven sooner tbh

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And now they got their hands on nukes again, yeeeeiiiii

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

Maybe they just think the sooner the planet is destroyed, the sooner they’ll be rescued from the rapture.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Is there any way to get them to realize if there’s a hell, this is how they gain admission?

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I think they didn’t read the book :/.

“Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.

For I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink, I was a stranger and you did not welcome me, naked and you did not clothe me, sick and in prison and you did not visit me.’

Then they also will answer, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to you?’ Then he will answer them, saying, ‘Truly, I say to you, as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me.’” ‭‭Matthew‬ ‭25‬:‭41‬-‭45‬ ‭(ESV‬‬)

““Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.” ‭‭Matthew‬ ‭7‬:‭21‬ ‭(ESV‬‬)

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Not these psychopaths.

Jesus is their savor, and they will shoot you in the face to prove it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Force them to take a class where they read the Bible?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I talked to a Jehovah Witness and he said he’d have voted for trump because God sent him…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Nope they genuinely think that the only reason we’re having these weather events is because there’s NOT ENOUGH carbon in the atmosphere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They are spreading 666 particles. They think God is going to forgive them for willingly spreading hell mass?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s definitely more of a ‘The Rapture is coming! The Rapture is coming!’ Type of nonsense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They do be that stupid!

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

At this point there just worshipping the golden calf. They’re not Christians anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Come on now. They wouldn’t…

Oh right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Jesus rolls coal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
113 points

It’s time for the world community to start treating the United States as an environmental, economic, and military threat. We are not a partner. We don’t value the wellbeing of anyone, be they in other countries or our own for that matter.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

They just need to “Under the Dome” the whole country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Yeah, but we have big trucks so than we can coal-roll and burn rubber all day long…

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Everybody who is signed up to it should impose tariffs or sanctions on those who are not.

permalink
report
reply
58 points

This will mainly hurt the American industries. The rest of the world is moving on, whether or not USA is on board.

permalink
report
reply
32 points
*

My concern is for the planet. The US is by far the largest contributor to climate change if you account for the additional emissions from US manufacturing in China. We can’t afford this move backwards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Earth will be just fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

True. I meant most life. The planet will balance itself once we’re all dead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Right? Its just that biological, carbon-based shit on it that’s gonna get cooked. This old rock is gonna be just fine. 🥹

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That is why they said “we”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Meh. The U.S. probably are also going to be one of the most affected and if Trump enacts all his economic ideas, the U.S. Economy will tank HARD, meaning the contribution to climate change will shrink regardless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Increasing dependency on cheaply made imported goods only increases the emissions from production by nations with lower regulations. Couple that with emissions from increased trade, and I’m not as sure that economic hardship would reduce the US footprint in a noticeable way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

https://www.euronews.com/green/2024/11/04/cop29-what-is-the-paris-agreement-and-how-will-countries-be-held-to-account-in-baku

The iconic international climate treaty - the Paris Agreement - includes a pledge to try and keep temperatures from rising by more than 1.5C above pre-industrial levels.

So how are countries doing on sticking to 1.5C or below? Well, not very well. Just last month the UN warned that current climate policies put the world on track for 3.1C of warming by 2100.

Probably going to need to be some change from the current trajectory, if so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points
*

It’s up to the rest of the world now. We can’t put climate action on hold for four years in hopes that a new administration will take over in 2029 that will lead the world in the transition away from fossil fuels.

The world has gotten very used to US leadership since the end of WWII, but that era is over. Maybe it should have ended a long time ago, but now it must. The US can’t lead anymore, we lack the competency, efficacy, and morality to lead the world. Someone else is going to have to captain the ship.

I think it’s important that America’s replacement not be just the next most powerful nation. I think it’s time for democracy to go global. We need the nations working together, instead of a single nation dominating the world through military might and economic control. The violent hegemonic orders of the past must be replaced with a global democratic order, based on inclusion, cooperation, and the consent of the governed.

Edit: I realized that I need to explain what I mean when I say that someone other than the US needs to take the leadership role in the transition away from fossil fuels. Climate action in an individual country is a very good thing, and very necessary, but climate change is a global problem. It’s great that countries are taking steps to reduce their own GHG emissions, but unless such action is taken everywhere it’s not going to be sufficient. GHG emissions have to reach net zero everywhere, not just in a few, relatively wealthy European countries. That will require cooperation and collaboration between nations, and I think that will require leadership. The US cannot be relied upon to lead that effort, so someone else is going to have to.

permalink
report
reply
34 points
*

On hold? That’s very optimistic of you.

Trump repealed 112 environmental regulations in his first term, during a pandemic, without preparation, rolling us back to the Bush Administration in multiple categories.

I think we’re going to go backwards again, most likely at a faster rate than his last term.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

It may need to be the EU. I know the EU isn’t a nation, but as a block perhaps Europe has the power and influence to lead the effort. Maybe a new entity needs to be established, a global union of nations. Or maybe a union of continents. Maybe each continent should establish its own union of nations (I think every continent already has some kind of union of one type or another) and then have a global union of continents. I don’t necessarily know the best course of action, all I know is the US cannot lead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I think the real problem that no one in the US is prepared to deal with is we are the bad guys in almost every situation. Once you peel off the thin veneer of freedom and supposed rights you are left with a militaristic corporate oligarchy. One that regularly uses and abuses human beings.

It is no surprise we played both sides before being involved in WWII. Powerful influential people from the US helped bank roll the Nazi party.

Then when this poison tree bore fruits the Nazi came to the US and other countries asking that we take the Jews.

The same people who backed the Nazi party in the US said hell the fuck no and doomed the Jews to die.

Then we go in killing a shit ton of innocent civilians and declare we are good guys. That’s right the people who helped create the Nazi and deny the Jews safety are the good fucking guys. Unfucking believable.

The truth behind the US is so ugly no one can truly face it. This is just one story in the book of fuckups we have perpetrated around the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

It’s up to the rest of the world now. We can’t put climate action on hold for four years

Incredibly ignorant US-centric thought. What the actual fuck do you think we’ve been doing the last decade while you’re driving about in your tiny-penis truck?!? 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I’m very aware that other countries have been taking climate action, much more than the US, in many cases. I didn’t say the rest of the world needed to start doing anything related to climate, as if they had been up until now doing nothing, I said they needed to take LEADERSHIP. And if you’re going to claim that the world hasn’t been looking to the US for leadership on climate action, you’re either an idiot or a liar.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

True, although most countries also didn’t improve as much as they should.

We’re in an economical prisoner dilemma here…
And when a country says, “fuck it, we’re going for short term profits”, the upcoming cost due to climate change will get distributed to pretty much every country.
Just like the bailout shit. Profits for cooperations, costs for the public.
Same shit again, just on a larger/worldwide scale

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

although most countries also didn’t improve as much as they should.

Its even worse than that. Literally nobody has done as much as needs to be done.

And far too many (at least in my country) seem to be saying “we are such a small drop in the ocean compared to (insert larger country here), so why should we go first?”.

It’s frustrating to see how badly we’re fucking our children and grandchildren through laziness, denial and greed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oh please let’s not pretend like every country isn’t plagued by this, our society’s best motto is money over everything including the future.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.9K

    Posts

  • 162K

    Comments