73 points

All these analysts trying to figure out how this tyrant who will be in control of all the Federal government can’t do this or that because a piece of paper says so. SMH.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

It’s not the piece of paper, it’s the amount of people who have to go along with something for it to happen. A lot of his and his zealous proposals are wildly unpopular.

Also Trump is a raging narcissist. If the focus ends up on project 2025 and makes him look bad, he will ditch whatever that item is. So I guess pick your battles and make noise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

You’re exactly correct. The law as it stands is irrelevant to what these analysts think. I’m not saying Trump can call every shot, but it doesn’t really get any easier to change or skirt laws he dislikes. Anyone who leans on the “but the law says…” argument is praying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
75 points

To the glee of the fascist dictator currently attempting Ukrainian genocide.

permalink
report
reply
31 points
*

All thanks to his friend, the US dictator elect

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Would it not be economic suicide to do so?

permalink
report
reply
76 points

Like how slapping double digit tariffs on literally everything would be economic suicide?

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

Voting for Trump was economic suicide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Everything he has proposed is economic suicide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

People don’t seem to understand that Trump is the Russians’ inside job.

The call is coming from inside of the house. The policies are meant to be bad on purpose. The people that destroy the country will be on planes to Moscow when all is said and done.

Russia won. The oligarchs won. We lost. That’s all there is to it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Political too. And geostrategic, of course. But that seems to be very much en vogue these days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Trump would be impeached if he tried. You think Raytheon and Boeing can’t buy enough congressmen to impeach him?

permalink
report
reply
89 points

He’s been fucking impeached twice already.

How do you people have such short fucking memories?

Nothing sticks to this dirtbag. That’s how he got that stupid nickname.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Ah, the irony of how poisonous Teflon actually turned out to be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-29 points

Successfully removed from office, not the ceremonial bullshit the dems do for the aesthetic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Bruh dems voted for it. They did what they could with the votes they had at the time. REPUBLICANS stone walled it because it’s party over country for them. They probably hoped that almost getting lynched by an angry fucking mob the sitting president refused to call in the National Guard on would get at least enough to flip to convict, but nope, republicans will apparently literally die before they vote for country over party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Republicans have at least 53 senators. He won’t be removed, just like the last two times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Trump would be impeached

Let’s assume that happens. What would that do, exactly? Can you think of any precedent where something like that has happened before? What was the net effect?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Can you think of any precedent where something like that has happened before?

In the US? The closest you’d get is JFK, if you think Allen Dulles was behind the assassination, and not just the coverup.

Outside the US? Constitutional coups after a country goes against US interests happen so frequently that it’s not even noteworthy.

What would that do, exactly?

Replace Trump with JD Vance, who I’m sure will be more amenable to the interests of the capitalist class.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Really? The closest thing in the US -- at all -- is from the 60s? Why do you suppose that is?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Are we still pretending that impeachment in the US is any kind of meaningful threat to a president?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If you understand it as a trial where a president who has done something wrong is held accountable according to the law, then no that’s idealist nonsense.

If you understand it as a mechanism that allows 50+ senators to replace the president with the VP if they want to, yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Who would impeach him? Raytheon and Boeing will get money via DoD as usual

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A lot less though. Keep in mind, Ukraine help is also a big plus in all the financial books, even though it looks like they just “get the money”…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Um, you know those companies can sell weapons and craft to other countries right? Trump will still be happy for Europeans to buy weapons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Oh, no, we’re out of NATO.

Or at the least we’ll have a CJCs that stops all NATO cooperation, so we’re in in name only.

Who am I kidding, either the CJCs or SecDef WILL be Michael Flynn.

permalink
report
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 7.6K

    Posts

  • 83K

    Comments