88 points

“So what you’re saying is we need to move further to the right.”

  • Democrats and pundits
permalink
report
reply
39 points

Exactly the message I expect them to take away from this, if 2016 and 2020 are any indication. Zero introspection.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I would not be surprised if the new iteration of the DNC is the 90s, early 2000s GOP. Look how they are spamming McCain on reddit.

Such a sick cruel joke to make it so the choices in our false election be GOP or Orange Putin.

Remember Tucker Carlson fucking a loaf of bread in a Russian grocery store? Well I hope you all like bread!

The only thing that makes all of this interesting is trumps inevitable death. I know his mental decline is in there too but they’ll just weekend at bernies him for the final years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Our constituents’ rent went up 15% and their wages stayed the same, so everything is basically ok.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t know why everyone keeps insisting that courting the right was a stupid move. I personally know a lot of life long Republicans that got real tired of the MAGA stuff. In this matchup specifically, trying to scoop the conservative-but-not-MAGA vote makes sense by the numbers. Obviously it didn’t pan out, but at least in theory, there should be a sizeable bloc of voters there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Less people voted Trump in 2024 than in 2020. It is not that Trump won, it is that Biden/Harris lost hard.

Trump: 74 Mio. in 2020, 73 Mio. in 2024

Biden/Harris: 81 Mio. in 2020, 69 Mio. in 2024

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election

Seems like people on the less right side of politics also got tired after the whole “we need to stop Trump or democracy ends” messaging led to an underwhelming / genocidal and dementia struck president

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

It’s easy to look back. I sincerely think that, based on research and subsequent speculation, appealing to non-MAGA conservatives was a rational play. It explains Liz Cheney and the whole nothing-will-fundamentally-change angle.

Again, didn’t pay off, but I’m sure research showed greater expected returns from conservatives than leftists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They were literally saying Democrats were too woke. Did you see any woke policies? None! Not even progressive. The media needs to join the rich on the pyre

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

To be fair, the Republicans did all these same things and won all three branches, so…

permalink
report
reply
43 points

It shouldn’t have to be repeated so often that maybe Republican voters aren’t who the Democratic party needs to be gearing itself to attract.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Turns out people who want those things can vote for Republicans. Who offer more of those things!

And the people who did not want those things stayed home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Because right wingers want that and left wingers don’t, that’s some surprising maths.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Republicans had a primary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

This point needs to be driven home over and over and over again. The democrats haven’t held a real primary where the DNC operatives weren’t interfering since 2008! which coincided with the election in a landslide of Obama after he won an extremely competitive primary.

Democrats learned the wrong lesson from that election, they thought it was identity politics that won the landslide. No idiots, it was democracy itself. Of course being the first black man to be president helped him but having an appealing platform that outcompeted everyone else’s (and a better record re Iraq war, he voted against it as senator unlike Clinton) won him the popular mandate that led to the landslide in the general. Against a formidable candidate! John McCain was no joke and I think todays democrats and even progressives would be thrilled to have him as president if he were still alive compared to our current options.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They’ve disenfranchised so many voters with their shenanigans, that it has cost them 2 out of the last 3 elections, and the person they had to beat should have been the most easily defeated candidate in the history of the United States. I would have voted for a literal dog over trump. At least a dog wouldn’t intentionally burn the country to the ground so he could rule over the ashes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Actually true. The Republican politicians at the time hated Trump in 2015

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

There is no single group of people on the planet Earth as adept at shitting and falling back in it as the Democrats.

They turned “Snatching Defeat from the Jaws of Victory” into an artform.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

This why people think they are a psyop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I don’t need convincing. They showed me in 2016 that they’re controlled opposition. Admitted it in court.

Wilding v. DNC Services Corp.

Google it for yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I don’t think there has ever, in history, been a group capable of doing that at this scale other than the Democratic Party. They are the greatest to ever do it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

Stop it Patrick, you’re scaring the liberals. Imagine how shocking it must be for reality to prove that the leftists were correct about everything this entire time. Again.

Really weird how leftists have a 100% accuracy rate about all of history going back 150 years, but I’m sure the liberals will take some Ws eventually.

Just keep barreling towards fascism, libs! I believe in you!

permalink
report
reply
27 points

“Voters voted for the choice furthest to the right because they wanted the choice on the left to be more left”

permalink
report
reply
46 points

People didn’t vote. Significantly less turnout this year than 2020. Further left is more exciting than an idiot chasing endorsement from Republicans.

It’s stupid, but if people weren’t stupid Trump wouldn’t have been a candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

2020 had the highest voter turnout in the history of our country because of the pandemic. Without a major motivator like the pandemic, we are not going to hit those numbers again.

So naturally there will be less voter turnout this year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Democrats and liberals will use any excuse not to consider progress

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Then compare it to 2016 - it was practically the same campaign strategy, only this time it lost the popular vote on top of the electoral collage.

Trying to flip people at the margin is not a winning strategy. Obama won in '08 by campaigning to the left and promising meaningful change – it got people who normally don’t vote to engage. Why is that strategy so anathema now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yes. People want a populous movement. In the absence of left-wing populism (like socialist reforms), they will take right win populism (fascism).

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Democrats campaigned on making billionaires pay their fair share and addressing health care and student loans etc so socialist reforms. But the majority of voters were still convinced that that would make them worse off unfortunately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

That might have been in the footnotes of the DNC platform, but Kamala said none of that.

Here’s a quote from Stephen Semler’s newsletter:

For example, in this video clip, Stephen Colbert asks Harris, “Under a Harris administration, what would the major changes be and what would stay the same?” Harris replies: “Sure. Well, I mean, I’m obviously not Joe Biden. So that would be one change. But also I think it’s important to say with 28 days to go, I’m not Donald Trump.”

First, that doesn’t answer the question. Second, that description applies to literally everyone except for Joe Biden and Donald Trump. This is the quality of candidate you get when the Democratic Party chooses one for you.

https://www.stephensemler.com/p/a-couple-charts-to-explain-a-harris?publication_id=37298&post_id=151256232>>

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Did they? If they did, then they did a terrible job of it, since many people didn’t hear that message. The message that everyone heard over and over again is “I’m not trump”. Besides, promising to get rid of student loans as a campaign promise when you just spent 4 years proving that you can’t really deliver on that promise seems unwise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Key word being, “addressing.” Medicare for All? Nope. They’re going to address healthcare costs. Student loans insanely expensive for the majority of Americans? They already tried addressing it. What are they going to do? Eliminate the filibuster to pass legislation? Stack the Supreme Court?

They’ve been a little better on taxing the wealthy, but raising taxes doesn’t mean much if you believe the revenue is going towards the military industrial complex or, “woke,” agenda, based on your political leanings.

Liberal half measures aren’t going to work anymore. They need a full-blown progressive agenda and the balls to ram it through whatever institution is in their way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Biden campaigned on similar promises and ideals like resolving student debt and improving the economy. Even personally relevant promises like creating a public health jobs corps (relevant to my degree and field of study). The only thing he sufficiently accomplished were the initial vaccination efforts, but it’s as if we stopped having an actual president into and after 2022: The filthy rich managed to get exponentially richer with this war-supply economy and stock market presidency. My student debt is still a burden in the back of my mind and all of my available graduate-entry jobs are either severely underpaid or shilled out to robots that also vet my applications. Until the war profiteer and stock market billionaires actually pay their fair share (which they should have been a few years ago) or provide citizens with jobs that can sustain a healthy living, any good socialist promises that are made are flat-out lies because senility and flacid mental acuity won’t even be a valid excuse anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

And all of that populist talk came to a grinding halt once companies like Black Rock started drafting economic policy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Less people voted Trump in 2024 than in 2020. It is not that Trump won, it is that Biden/Harris lost hard.

Trump: 74 Mio. in 2020, 73 Mio. in 2024

Biden/Harris: 81 Mio. in 2020, 69 Mio. in 2024

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Less people voted overall in 2024. That’s less for Trump and Harris. Because 2020 was the highest voter turnout ever. It was record breaking because of the pandemic. Without another motivator as big as the pandemic you’re going to see less voters for both Trump and Harris. You’re also going to see many different reasons claiming why. But it’s a fact that if you don’t have record breaking overall voter turnout in 2024 also, both sides will lose voters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I know someone who didn’t vote and gave this exact logic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

What logic specifically?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

He wanted an actual progressive and refused to vote for a Democrat since the Democrats aren’t embracing progressivism, despite the fact that not voting for a Democrat means there’s a greater likelihood that we end up even further from progressivism.

In short: the exact logic in your comment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

More like out of 2 right wing options people went for the more right wing option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Democrats have been moving further left ever since progressives joined them. This “democrats aren’t left enough” talking point is in line with the Russian strategy to polarize American politics more so that we dont get anything done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Til their platform, messaging and strategy is just Russian

permalink
report
parent
reply

Late Stage Capitalism

!latestagecapitalism@lemmy.world

Create post

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or ‘wasted votes on 3rd party’ is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, ‘paid by Putin,’ etc.

Community stats

  • 2.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 66

    Posts

  • 368

    Comments