Summary

At a North Carolina rally, Donald Trump used aggressive language, questioning if he was “allowed to hit” Michelle Obama after her recent criticism of his values and policies.

Though Trump spoke metaphorically, his comments drew backlash, with analysts calling the remark in poor taste. Trump recounted an imaginary conversation with his staff advising him to tone down his rhetoric, prompting cheers from supporters urging him to “hit back.”

The statement, shared widely on social media, has raised concerns about its impact on the gender gap and support among conservative women voters.

112 points

Would be wild to watch Michelle’s Secret Service detail beat up Donald’s Secret Service detail.

permalink
report
reply

It’d probably be more like:

Michelle’s detail: “Can’t you just tell him to sit down?”
Donald’s detail: “yeah don’t worry about it. we’re used to it by now, skinny Jonas over there can hold him in a seat one handed, just put a big Mac on the table and he’ll forget all about this in like 30 seconds”

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Theyre eating the bigmacs, theyre eating the mcchickens, theyre eating the fast food of the people that live there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Even better is the fact that Trump’s Secret Service detail would likely be… shall we say “less than motivated” to protect their charge

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

I don’t know about that. Remember that the Secret Service “lost” all their text messages from Jan 6th.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Achh, good point. I’d forgotten about that

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I want to believe they “lost” them because they called him names

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Would be nice to think so, but apparently they’re Trumpers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Makes sense. Very few others want anything to do with him in person even in an official capacity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

So a friend works in a building in DC that also has some USSS offices. They said that a lot of them are Trumpers. I had the same thought as you when the news came out years ago that he had bankrupted their budget. Friend said no, they still love him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Does she have secret service?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It would be wild to watch Michelle walk Trump up and down the streets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I suspect both details would detain him. Like, you have to be an idiot to bring any secret service to attack someone protected by the secret service. It’s on par with attempting to counterfeit around them

permalink
report
parent
reply
231 points

Call it a hunch. But I doubt it would be the first time he’s hit a woman.

permalink
report
reply
113 points

I mean he’s been found guilty of raping at least one woman… so he’s easily hit one already.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

You don’t need to hit someone in order to rape them

permalink
report
parent
reply
110 points

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/10/24/documenting-trumps-abuse-of-women

The part of the book that caused the most controversy concerns Trump’s divorce from his first wife, Ivana. Hurt obtained a copy of her sworn divorce deposition, from 1990, in which she stated that, the previous year, her husband had raped her in a fit of rage. In Hurt’s account, Trump was furious that a “scalp reduction” operation he’d undergone to eliminate a bald spot had been unexpectedly painful. Ivana had recommended the plastic surgeon. In retaliation, Hurt wrote, Trump yanked out a handful of his wife’s hair, and then forced himself on her sexually. Afterward, according to the book, she spent the night locked in a bedroom, crying; in the morning, Trump asked her, “with menacing casualness, ‘Does it hurt?’ ” Trump has denied both the rape allegation and the suggestion that he had a scalp-reduction procedure. Hurt said that the incident, which is detailed in Ivana’s deposition, was confirmed by two of her friends

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

“Does it hurt?”

We saw the same contempt during the debate when he said, “I’m talking now. Does that sound familiar?” What an utter psychopath.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Trump has denied both the rape allegation and the suggestion that he had a scalp-reduction procedure.

And I bet dumpster donnie is more annoyed by the scalp reduction coming to light…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I guess he’s got a deep wish to be beaten by a black woman. Let’s make it happen

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

I just saw a commercial for Logan Paul v Mike Tyson.

I’d rather see Michelle slap the orange off turdburglars face.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

I just saw a commercial for Logan Paul v Mike Tyson.

Wait. I thought Paul cancelled the fight?

Edit: Dude! Sweeeeeeeeeet! My night just got better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Downvoters don’t want to see Logan Paul get punched in his stupid face.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I can’t wait to see Tyson obliterate Paul.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The problem is that he gets paid for it and he also wants more viewers. Watching the fight only justifies him and gives him what he wants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Already showing us how he wants to protect women.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

Whether they like it or not

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Even if he was able to get a cheap shot in when her back was turned, my money is on her with an easy first round knock-out.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Oh, definitely. Even beyond age, cardio, strength, etc. imagine how much she hates him after all the death threats to her and her family. She’d even have the pure cussedness advantage. I could see a full blown Waffle House 3am level ass whooping coming his way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Please, it would be Black Widow and that fat Russian fuck in the first Avengers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yeah, it’s really hard to fight with a full diaper.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 212K

    Comments