Summary

Eighteen-year-old Nevaeh Crain died from sepsis after Texas’s abortion ban delayed critical medical intervention during her pregnancy complications.

Despite multiple ER visits and severe symptoms, doctors waited to confirm fetal demise before acting due to the state’s restrictive laws. Crain endured intense pain and deteriorating health over multiple hospital visits, ultimately suffering a miscarriage and passing away from internal bleeding.

Medical experts believe timely intervention could have saved her. Her mother, Candace Fails, is pursuing legal accountability but faces significant legal hurdles under Texas’s stringent emergency care standards.

-5 points

Whatever, Texas, you voted you got it.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Did they, though? Do we know how Nevaeh Crain and Candace Fails voted? Would that somehow make it okay?

The fact thay people who have done nothing to support these policies can still be killed by them is PRECISELY the problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

They shouldn’t get pregnant in Texas because the laws in Texas could kill them. Wear a condom if you fuck in Texas.

(I realize that in some situations, like rape, it’s not up to the woman and in those cases my snarky comments do not apply)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oh so abstinence should be the policy. Got it. Good plan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

https://www.propublica.org/article/nevaeh-crain-death-texas-abortion-ban-emtala

“Fails and Crain believed abortion was morally wrong. The teen could only support it in the context of rape or life-threatening illness, she used to tell her mother. They didn’t care whether the government banned it, just how their Christian faith guided their own actions.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

A 18 year old absolutely didnt vote, not that it makes a difference you bloodthirsty fiend

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They were 18 you really think they “choose” to live in t*xas?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

She didn’t choose it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Where do you live?

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

“Since her death, Fails has sought legal action to hold the hospitals accountable.”

Wrong target. You go after the politicians who passed the law that killed your daughter.

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*

What are you talking about?

Are you saying that instead of suing the hospital, she should start up a PAC to go after hundreds of Texas state politicians…?

Because if you meant sue them for wrongful death, they are exempt. So even if they are more directly culpable in their daughter’s death, she cannot bring direct legal action against them for that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Criminal action. They directly killed her daughter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s indirect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

You are aware that legislatures cannot be held directly criminally responsible for the laws they pass, right?

I’m not disputing that their actions killed their daughter, I’m trying to explain to you that they cannot be held legally responsible in the manor you’re suggesting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

If you close down all the hospitals with lawsuits, the politicians will be held accountable. One would hope, at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Neveah

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Worst. Name. Ever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

She went… back to heaven

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

all god’s plan or some shit

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Why are American conservatives such a bunch of loonies? Conservatives in other developed countries allow abortion in cases of clear danger to the health of the mother and/or the fetus/baby. American conservatives is as bad the Taliban.

permalink
report
reply

I’ve been wondering the same thing. Many countries around the world that are seemingly more religious have far less restrictions. Texas’ restrictions are absolutely draconian by comparison.

Looking at the two countries I live in, for example:

Portugal is a very catholic and traditional country. And yet abortion is legal for any or no reason up to 10 weeks, plus up to 24 weeks if the mother’s health is impaired (need not be life threatening).

Argentina’s population is like 75% Roman Catholic, many of them rather devout, and yet they allow abortion up to 14 weeks without any restrictions.

In both countries, these laws enjoy widespread support and are not considered controversial; the local conservative parties have zero interest in touching it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It seems to me that the conservatives here in the US had to make so much noise about these pet wedge issues like abortion, since they didn’t have real policies to improve the country, that they built a feedback loop with the conservative voters who have thought of abortion as the #1 issue for decades.

So it has decades of building momentum plus the all-important “I care about hurting the people I don’t like more than I care about helping anybody” factor. Couple that with the modern Republican mindset that expects to take everything and give nothing, and you get some dumb decisions.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.9K

    Posts

  • 162K

    Comments