14 points

Cram them under AMD and make it not-a-monopoly by ending all x86 patents.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Even if they did, starting a chip company is fucking difficult AF. You don’t want one mega company. You end up in a situation like Canada where they have one airline company and barely any cell carriers.

Competition is healthy. Fingers crossed that Nvidia starts making x86 CPUs as well as Qualcomm. AMD needs more competition too.

The GPU industry also needs some real competition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Other chip companies abound, they just cannot make x86. That’s been a duopoly for nearly thirty years. VIA was an asterisk on that until they got bought by some Chinese company. Cyrix tried faking their way around it via what we’d now call microcode, and it went poorly.

x86 would become like ARM… which admittedly could be devastating toward RISC-V.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

They deserve to fail so fucking hard though

permalink
report
reply
14 points

You’re only saying that because it’s true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Feeding people that can’t afford to eat because of low salaries and high prices: That’s socialism!

Giving billions to a company that deserves to be replaced: That’s capitalism!

permalink
report
reply
72 points

Privatize profits, and socialize losses…

permalink
report
reply
0 points
*

Oh, so if China helps out their companies, it’s meddling but if the US government fucking bails out a company that should go bankrupt because of dreadful and shit management, it’s a necessary step to secure national interests. So much for “the free market will regulate itself”.

Hypocrites.

Anti Commercial-AI license

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Q: how do you remain competitive against your competitors if those have the backing of an entire nation behind them?

A: you don’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

AMD should be the next monopoly. Let Intel die in peace.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

You do have to consider that Intel has a head start of multiple decades, should’ve had a war-chest the size of a nation (like Nintendo), and has a nigh monopoly position in the CPU market. Intel also has preferential treatment in the US (similar to Microsoft), so it’s not it isn’t already being funded by the US government.

You don’t catch up on decades of research just by pumping in money. That’s like trying to have a baby faster by having more women.

Trying to pretend Intel is the underdog in this scenario is not credible. Despite - or maybe exactly due to, their head start, pseudo-leaders who thought they could survive any boneheaded decision are giving that lead away. And yet again, tax payer money may have to be used to correct the decisions of a private company (yes publicly traded but the government doesn’t own Intel). Privatise profits, nationalise debt. Works every time!

Anti Commercial-AI license

permalink
report
parent
reply

PC Gaming

!pcgaming@lemmy.ca

Create post

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

Community stats

  • 4.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 9.7K

    Comments