That’s two wives. Lol, what a weird way to represent that ratio. Just saying.
It’s weird to point out that the man will a history of lying to multiple wives about their relationship is being hypocritical towards an ad telling vulnerable women to lie so they can exercise their rights?
No. That’s fucked up, of course. But I wouldn’t usually represent that number with a percent. I would just say, “2 out of his 3 wives” or something like that. That’s all.
I know this is a tense political season, but there’s no reason to jump down my throat. I’m with y’all.
The Hill - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Hill:
Wiki: reliable - The Hill is considered generally reliable for American politics. The publication’s opinion pieces should be handled with the appropriate guideline. The publication’s contributor pieces, labeled in their bylines, receive minimal editorial oversight and should be treated as equivalent to self-published sources.
MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Search topics on Ground.News
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4965914-newt-gingrich-slams-harris-ad/
Telling people to lie is a really bad look. Doesn’t matter where you are on the political spectrum.
Perhaps you could say that if you arbitrarily remove any nuance or qualifications at all from the statement.
A reasonable person would see a message advising women to hide who they vote for from their signficant others and question why they (Harris’s advisors) thought the message would land. And what that says about the people those women are married to.
Yes the people they chose to marry.
This really is highly triggering stuff for a certain kind of “man”.
