While millions will still vote for the Republican candidate, perhaps hating immigrants more than they love reproductive rights, the only certainty at this point is that many millions more will vote for Vice President Kamala Harris. In the latest ABC News/Ipsos national poll, the Democrat enjoyed a 14% advantage with women over Trump; among women with a college degree, that number rose to 23%; among women voters under 40, it rocketed to 34%.

That, in turn, is causing some MAGA commentators to break from their usual posture of feigned confidence to outright panic.

“Early vote has been disproportionately female,” Charlie Kirk, head of Turning Point USA and helping to lead the Trump campaign’s get-out-the-vote effort, posted on social media. “If men stay at home, Kamala is president. It’s that simple.”

355 points

Ladies, divorce your Republican husband while you still can.

permalink
report
reply
68 points

Based and actually good advice

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

From a hotel in another city or a distant but good friend’s place. Avoid the black eyes please.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Unless you’re the one giving them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Ah, but republican men are pushing for laws to make it difficult or even illegal to divorce them without permission.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

That’s the joke

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

It’s not a joke, it’s deadly serious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s likely why they said “while you still can”, but yeah.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

See, now if a billionaire would just finance divorce lawyers for this, then I might have a second thing on my list of things that billionaires are good for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I was about to ask you what the first thing was.

Then my stomach rumbled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

grim

permalink
report
parent
reply
223 points

They’re preparing to strip women from voting, like in the good ol’ times.

permalink
report
reply
84 points

We’re not going to let that happen. I refuse to go backwards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
112 points

I refuse to go backward too, but they overuled Roe, which my aunties told me would NEVER happen. So just not going back isn’t enough. We have to move forward.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

Well if early indicators are correct, not only will Kamala win, it’s possible to retake congress.

To state the obvious… Go Vote, bring your friends, every vote counts. Especially when it comes to down ballot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

We already have, babe. Bodily autonomy for us is no longer a guarantee.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
16 points

So I remember hearing in HS US history class that one of the arguments against women’s suffrage 100-odd years ago is that married men would now have 2 votes instead of one. This would disadvantage them against bachelors or widowers, who would of course not be able to dictate their nonexistent wives’ votes. Unmarried men would only have the one vote, which didn’t seem fair.

I guess the idea is not a new worry. It just seems like the fretting has reversed its polarity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Voter suppression is their go-to, so they’ll outright ban various groups from voting if they are able to.

Ban non-whites, raise the voting age, require owning land.

permalink
report
parent
reply
98 points
*

The fact that they’re still married to these assholes is beyond me at this point.

I hope that the trend that young people have of not wanting to fuck Republicans hold because seriously, stop fucking Republicans by stop fucking Republicans.

permalink
report
reply
38 points

You get into these things when you’re younger and it’s very hard to get out again later.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

you get into these things when you’re younger.

What, chauvanistic conservativism?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Or anything else you can think of. Human behavior is stochastic. My real point is that people don’t recognize problems when they are younger–red flags from narcissistic behavior, for example. It’s easy to get into a relationship without realizing that the person you love will abuse you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

I wouldn’t say don’t fuck republicans, but do not marry one without a prenup because there is like a 90% chance they’ll go insane because they saw non-white bandaids on a shelf or something

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

They want to make contraception and abortions both illegal.

Dont fuck Republicans, it’ll have a very long tail if you do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
86 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
30 points

Some numbers guy political consultant said “This is the best way to turn out votes in the last week of the election” and a bunch of campaigns believed it.

It’s all just consultant Voodoo. Whomever wins still have described the signs and rituals one must perform to become President, and then everyone else will try to do the same thing four years from now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean he’s getting paid by a known moron. You could sell him glitter foundation and he would go out looking like a disco ball.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I live in Florida, and got a handwritten post card with the “Whether or not you voted” line. Felt oddly threatening. Stuff like this is why I vote early to avoid the attempted intimidation to sway my vote right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points

Democrats are doing creepy stuff, too.

From the Center for Voter Information:

Dear xxxxxx,

Public records indicate that you are eligible to vote in the upcoming election on Tuesday, November 5, 2024. Remember, who you vote for is private, but whether or not you voted is public record.

We’re sending this mailing to you and your neighbors to share who does and does not vote in an effort to promote election participation. While we have hidden the name and street number of your neighbors to protect their privacy, these are their true voting records.

[table showing whether I and two of my neighbors voted on the last four elections.]

We will be reviewing these records after the election to determine whether or not you joined your neighbors in voting.

None of this is OK.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

The center for voter information is not associated with democrats. They’re an apolitical non profit whose goal is to get more people voting.

And yes. They are creepy. But they’re not democrats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I agree that’s a flyer like this could be worded a lot different to spread awareness without sounding threatening. They also send out mailers that tell candidates’ positions on topics that has been questionably factually in the past. Conversely I had received before the voting period a mailer listing all the judges of the county and their own statements, basically a consolidation of information, that was very helpful. It’s about knowing how far to go, and of course being truly non-partisan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Conversely I had received before the voting period a mailer listing all the judges of the county and their own statements, basically a consolidation of information, that was very helpful.

I need this. I left the judges ones blank because IDK a thing about these people and you can’t find things about them online!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

How the fuck is that considered a threat?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Why isn’t it okay?

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points
*

Goddammit, men. Why do you have to always make us all look bad?

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Damned Scot’s! They ruined Scotland!

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Like Republicans and Democrats
Or Republicans and Blacks
Or Republicans and Mexicans
Or Republicans and Muslims
Or Republicans and Immigrants
Or Republicans and Atheists
Or Republicans and Gays
Or Republicans and Trans
Or Republicans and Women
Or Republicans and Single Women
Or Republicans and Cat owners
Or Republicans and people Not Republican Enough!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m doing my best not to, and don’t think I have. Much, anyway?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 187K

    Comments