43 points

Washington Toast

permalink
report
reply
1 point

picture of Kelly self-insert

permalink
report
parent
reply
159 points

The numbers are based on the number of cancellation emails that have been sent out, according to a source at the paper, though the subscriber dashboard is no longer viewable to employees.

Bozos doesn’t like you looking at how badly he fucked up.

permalink
report
reply
63 points

Do Amazon next. I plan to let mine expire. Amazon video is trash.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

I don’t think I’ve ever watched anything from Amazon directly.

Seen lots of their content though :) 🏴‍☠️

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Arr, yarr, haharrr!

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Seen lots of their content though :) 🏴‍☠️

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I always get excited when I see the files labelled with AMZN, the quality is consistent

Even when I was a subscriber, I would just grab the torrent, much more enjoyable to watch with VLC than a browser

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Letting mine go. I kept it for Vox Machina, but I will acquire it other ways next season and support the team directly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Yup, I’m not paying an extra $3/mo on top of what I pay for prime for no ads, I’ll just not watch what’s on your service. Not to mention, most of the filler movies/shows on all of these streaming services are garbage anyway. If it weren’t for my wife, I would just have my Jellyfin server by itself.

If I lived anywhere near a city and not in the mountains, I wouldn’t have prime either. It just saves too much time whereas my time is in short supply and I don’t have it to make a 3 hour round trip run every few days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

CNN talks about WaPo getting a backlash for not endorsing, but says nothing about Bezos intervention, lol.

https://lite.cnn.com/2024/10/29/media/usa-today-gannett-newspapers-endorsement-president/index.html

permalink
report
reply
6 points

That’s weird. I know CNN is quite familiar with dipshits intervening in coverage, so they should be able to spot it. They had one fuckface bend over backwards to give Donald an hour in front of a friendly live audience with a milquetoast moderator who was able to do fuckall against the lies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Was there any evidence that Bozos made that decision? We’re all ready to believe it but want it just one persons allegation or something?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-57 points

I don’t really understand. A news outlet shouldn’t be engaging in bias.

So it’s unethical and propaganda when one endorses your opponent and just as much so when one doesn’t do the same thing for yours?

In other countries, we call that hypocrisy or a ‘doible-standard’. I believe I’ve heard Americans say something similar as, “Rules for thee but not for me.”

The only thing that should be done is reporting on the other news outlet breeching journalism ethics or influencing in an election, because that’s the news here.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

Every previous election for a long time wapo has endorsed a candidate. The only reason they aren’t is because of the second richest man in the world told them not to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

1880 to 1968, no official endorsements for or against any presidential candidate

1972 anti-Republican endorsement

1976, 80, 84 pro-Democrat endorsements

1988 no endorsement

1992, 96, 00, 04, 08, 12, 16, 20 pro-Democrat endorsements

2024 no endorsement

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I would consider all but 1 since 1972 to be a long time, it’s longer than I’ve been alive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

So they started endorsing the Democrats when the Republicans became a criminal enterprise over half a century ago you mean.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Every news organisation is biased. The content they choose to emphasize, the time they spend on a subject, who they interview or what they say is all bias. How often they return to it or when it gets covered also show bias.

Bias in news is not automatically bad. Lying or false representation is. Somewhere in the recent past we swallowed some sort of pill making us think news agencies can’t have a stance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Newspapers have a long history of publishing editorials and opinion pieces. Newspapers are rarely, if ever, pure, objective news. Endorsements fall under the editorial content. They are an established tradition.

When the owner dictates that no endorsement should be made because it conflicts with his views, that’s a problem. It’s not the editors with domain knowledge making the call but the self-serving business-man doing it. And it’s not for the good of the paper, it’s for his business interests and personal ideology.

That is the problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Not even just that, if this decision had been made last January, this wouldn’t be news, but the fact that it was made in the last few days in the run up to the election means that no matter how altruistic their decision was, it’s gonna be viewed in the light of the current moment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

All journalism has bias, it’s literally impossible to not have a bias. It’s how the journalist corrects that bias that is important. But understanding that might require nuance that you don’t yet have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I believe not wanting to put the guy back in who did nothing as the Saudi’s bone sawed one of your writers falls into; common sense.

Bozo thought his own op ed was more important than the journalism of his “editorial board”, people who he presumably pays to write opinions. People who are journalists.

He thinks he’s an astronaut and a journalist because he can buy rocket companies and papers, but he’s a clown demonstrating his own lack of understanding of bias in plain English, his paper is worth but the circus music following him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

So freedom of speech really is just a cudgel the right uses against the left? It’s not really something they believe in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

This clown has done an insurrection, says he’s allowed to kill political opponents, promises to be a dictator, says Haitians are eating cats. Among other things, that’s nowhere near a comprehensive list. Any news outlet that is not explicitly saying “this is the worst choice for the country” is biased. It is an objective fact that Donald is the wrong choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

This clown has done an insurrection, says he’s allowed to kill political opponents, promises to be a dictator, says Haitians are eating cats. Among other things, that’s nowhere near a comprehensive list.

It should have been over for him the moment he mocked disabled journalist Serge Kovaleski in November of 2015 in any reasonable society.

Some more links if anyone needs resources to share with people (don’t give up hope):

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I think what I look for is not being unbiased, but being independent. i.e. no conflict of interests, no direct relation with any political entities, not vested in the success of either side. And WaPo has failed that.

And stop pretending both sides are equal. Endorsing Trump is unethical.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Uhh, stating that Kamala Harris would make a better President than Donald Trump is a factual statement, not a biased one.

There is no objective measure to assess the performance of a President where Trump would exceed Harris.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Just so you know, Saltesc has made a string of bad faith comments that are pro right-wing bs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t disagree at all. Trump is an absolute madman, and it’s amazing to me that he’s even in the conversation for running for president.

But, facts need to be cited, always. If a newspaper endorses Harris and says she’s a better candidate than Trump, they had better explain with evidence why this is the case. Not doing so would be just as biased, and one of the cornerstones of a Democratic campaign is truth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, yeah. Presumably that’s why WaPo had a whole editorial devoted to it, and not just one sentence that said “Harris will be a better President than Trump.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I don’t really understand. A news outlet shouldn’t be engaging in bias.

I don’t really understand. A commenter shouldn’t so obviously have bad faith takes on their profile.

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points

Their subscriber numbers have been absolutely decimated by Bezos’ decision.

permalink
report
reply
95 points

It’s down 10% which is the literal definition of decimated!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
6 points

The description goes first, then the link.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Literally decimated would be “down to 10%” aka down 90% I think I was wrong

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

All you had to do was click the link and you would have found out that you are wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Decimation means killing 1/10th of a group or population.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

To be human is to err sometimes, it’s okay, you are good

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 10K

    Posts

  • 199K

    Comments