Robert Downey Jr. plans to sue any Hollywood executive who signs off on the creation of his digital replica.

5 points

lol, like that’s going to stop them.

You signed their contracts and they will find a way to own and replicate your likeness.

permalink
report
reply
25 points
*

surely the contracts he signed are for a limited number of appearances, not to use his likeness in perpetuity. this is nothing new in hollywood, contracts have been drawn up considering likenesses for a very long time, AI is not really anything new in that regard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Did he just now realize that he signed away the rights to his digital likeness many years ago?

permalink
report
reply
9 points

did he though? in perpetuity?

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

If he did, he likely did that before it was possible to create photorealistic digital clones. Then it’s an interesting question about how US contract law works: are you able to agree on something that is not possible at the time of signing?

Surely, if the contract would contain some explicit clause about that. But if it just said some like “we can do anything we want with the video material”, then it’s probably less clear.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

there’s no way this was not accounted for by his agent or whoever negotiated for him. You can’t even use a photograph of an actor in a movie without negotiating an “image and likeness” agreement.

For example, Crispin Glover sued and got a settlement because they used his likeness in BTtF2 and 3 by making George Mcfly’s new actor look like Glover with makeup and prosthetics. CGI and AI don’t change that at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I’m pretty sure it’s closer to your second paragraph there, also “within the known universe”.

(meaning our universe, not a cinematic universe)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Interesting point.

Michael Jackson sold his digital likeness when it was only possible with the most advanced computer imagery hardware. Majel Barrett recorded her voice to be synthesized and then died before it was actually possible to do so convincingly.

I think there’s a lot of cases like this that are too vague and written before the technology was fully understood to clearly indicate legal rights and will have to be renegotiated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
99 points

“I don’t envy anyone who has been over-identified with the advent of this new phase of the information age. The idea that somehow it belongs to them because they have these super huge start-ups is a fallacy,” Downey told Swisher about figures like Altman. “The problem is when these individuals believe that they are the arbiters of managing this but meanwhile are wanting and/or needing to be seen in a favorable light. That is a massive fucking error. It turns me off and makes me not want to engage with them because they are not being truthful.”

👏🏼👏🏼

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Dude just said what rub me the wrong way these AI mumbo jumbo techbro do, that i myself can’t really quite get why.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

And this was the day Robert Downey Jr. discovered just how little power he actually held.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

how so? suing for unauthorized use of likeness is not unusual.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

People, your likeness can’t be used by others commercially without your consent, and this goes back way before AI or even computers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_rights#United_States

For example:

actor Crispin Glover filed a lawsuit against Universal Studios for both the unauthorized use of his likeness and the use of footage of him from Back to the Future in Back to the Future Part II; his permission had not been sought for the latter and he received no payment. After a motion to dismiss was denied, the case was settled for an undisclosed amount. The Screen Actors Guild changed its rules to prohibit its members from unauthorized mimicking of other SAG members.[51][52]

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Does this mean Elvis impersonators are breaking the law?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

If they’re not in SAG and/or it’s not a SAG-covered field, then no.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s definitely a SAG-covered field, especially with later-era Elvises.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Not just Elvis, there are a lot of celebrity impersonators out there. I’m guessing they are legal or traditionally tolerated for some reason. Maybe the fact that it’s in-person vs in a film/tv show/ad/print makes it different.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

How’d that work out for Johansson?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Well we don’t know, the case is ongoing. But it’ll probably go in her favor. Judges currently tend to dislike AI.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

the AI piece is kind of irrelevant. the only relevant parts as far as I understand are how much the “image” directly resembles her, and the laws in the specific state (I believe her state of residence, but could be wrong).

permalink
report
parent
reply

Movies

!movies@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW’s home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put “(Spoilers)” in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don’t want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don’t support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

Community stats

  • 2.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 786

    Posts

  • 5.3K

    Comments