71 points

Pretty sure the EU won’t let the UK rejoin with the same privileges next time

permalink
report
reply
33 points

They better fucking not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Ashamed to ask as an EU citizen, but did UK have some kind of special founding member privileges or something before? Didn’t think we had that in the EU, only the vote by population size stuff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I believe some other countries also keep their currency.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

We do, and Ireland, Denmark and Poland have gotten opt-outs, too (link). The United Kingdom, however, was so extreme about it, that Wikipedia dedicated an entire article just to their opt-outs.

The UK was no founding member of the EU by choice, if I remember correctly. And later on, they only joined due to the financial prospects, not the underlying idea(ls). They always acted as though they were special when they were part of the union (see aforementioned opt-outs) and completely lost it during the Brexit negotiations, when they acted as though they had some sort of leverage over the entire EU. I quite like CGP Grey’s video on the topic: youtube.com

In my opinion, the French were right when they didn’t want the British to join the union; most of their initial reservations did come true, after all. So, if the UK rejoined the common market without joining the EU, like Norway, for example, that would be fine by me. But no more.

As long as the British do not change their overall stance to the EU much more (and come to terms with their non-specialness), anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

The UK joined later.

And yes they did have special concessions (namely a currency opt-out, like Denmark, and a Schengen opt-out, like Ireland and I believe others), although the UK were far from the only ones that had special concessions. E.g. France has a roughly the same sized economy to the UK yet contributed billions less to the budget.

I’m not really sure why people act like the UK is the only country who had concessions. Various countries have all kinds of concessions, and the wealthiest ones typically had more, because they had the most political leverage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The big ones are currency and the common agricultural policy. Schengen, meh, Britain is an island. There’s plenty of EU territory that’s not in Schengen what would be important is that Gibraltar joins the area for the simple reason that you can walk there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

The UK is the only country that got a discount on their payments.

Edit: I stand corrected. One of a few

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The UK wasn’t a founding member.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

A major point the others fail to mention is that they got a special discount on their contributions to the EU Budget.

This reduction amounts to roughly 66% of the difference between the UK’s contributions to, and receipts from, the EU budget

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think they would, since once UK joins any other state considering leaving can just be shown UK’s example if she had joined EU, it could be said it was with tail between her legs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Fingers crossed 🤞

permalink
report
reply
25 points
*

Certainly would be good for both parties. Both the EU and the UK were weakened by the move.

Unfortunately, in the UK, while most people think Brexit was a mistake, and most would vote to rejoin if there was a referendum (this has been backed up, by a large margin in polls for years now)… there’s not much of a movement to actually call for one to be held.

Brexit dominated the political scene all the way back to the EU/Syrian refugee crisis, up until 2021. Aside from COVID, nothing else was even spoken about in political news or in parliament.

No other issues in the country got any attention, so much political capital was spent on Brexit, to the detriment of everything else. I think people are wary of having another 5+ year onslaught of hearing about nothing other than Brexit.

I do certainly think it’s possible (and IMO preferable), though. Labour seem intent on getting closer and closer to the EU. Maybe their plan is to continue with that and hope rejoining is on the cards later. Unfortunately right now it’s a hard sell, based on the fatigue around the entire Brexit discussion I mentioned above.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Would it really be that great for the EU, though? After all, the UK was never particularly fond of the European idea generally and further integration (i.e. federalization) in particular, to put it mildly. My biggest fear is the UK might go back blocking just about anything that goes beyond simple trade deals.

So, imho, the EU would be better off it the UK simply rejoined the common market, but not the political union. We have more than enough dissent, as is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Yes, it would. Both benefit from it. That’s why the UK and EU are (mostly silently and in the background) getting closer again, and why a number of EU politicians are making remarks like this.

And the UK didn’t block everything other than trade deals. In fact the UK didn’t really block much at all if you look into it.

They didn’t use their veto more than other large economies, and the likes of Poland and Hungary blocked more. And let’s not get into the Netherlands, Ireland, and others blocking attempts at closing tax loopholes.

It’s not like the EU has seen massive structural changes since it was “unshackled” from the UK, is it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

If the UK cannot marginalize their conservatives, there can be no reunification. When conservatives have any power at all, they use it to make the UK worse and keep it that way. This is just the nature of conservatism.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

If the UK cannot marginalize their conservatives, there can be no reunification.

The EU skeptisicm isn’t just a converative thing. The majority of front-bench MPs during the referendum era were Pro EU, and the labour party were divdied on it too. Jeremy Corbyn would never ever give a straight answer on his position on the EU because he was staunchly anti-EU, but his base supporters were hard-remainers.

When conservatives have any power at all, they use it to make the UK worse and keep it that way. This is just the nature of conservatism.

100% agree

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

And then promptly complain about it

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Let’s rejoin as full members and all of that bullshit will have allowed progress at the end.

permalink
report
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.org

Create post

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don’t overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don’t post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don’t troll nor incite hatred. Don’t look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia’s List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add “/s” when you’re being sarcastic (and don’t use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They’re cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don’t evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don’t show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

Community stats

  • 3.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 966

    Posts

  • 6.5K

    Comments