Jared Kushner just flagrantly violating the Logan Act multiple times. Will anything come of it? Doubtful.

11 points

Fucking duh. Why do you think they paid like a billion dollars for his shitty property?

permalink
report
reply
-12 points
*

Nobody has ever been found guilty of violating the Logan Act. Nobody has even been charged with it in over 150 years.

Why? Probably because prosecutors realize that in the modern era, a 1798 law that bans “commencing or carrying on any correspondence with a foreign government” would almost certainly be struck down on First Amendment grounds.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

You do not have a first amendment right to negotiate a contract on behalf of an unwilling partner.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points
*

The Logan Act says nothing about contracts.

It bans “correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States”.

Trying to influence others is fundamentally protected by the First Amendment, even if (especially if!) your interests are not the same as those of the government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

you’re misrepresenting the first amendment and you know it. why are you like this? is this who you want to be?

pathetic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

International diplomacy without being an elected official or appointed by one is not protected speech. Using overly reductive language to make it sound like a campaign stop won’t change that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Trying to influence others is fundamentally protected by the First Amendment, even if (especially if!) your interests are not the same as those of the government.

Charles Manson would like to hire you as a lawyer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It bans “correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States”.

What exactly do you think negotiating U.S.-Saudi diplomacy when he wasn’t tasked to by the government is doing?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

So does the crown prefer axes or cordless reciprocating saws for body disposal?

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Creep recognize creep.

permalink
report
reply
94 points

Isn’t this illegal?

permalink
report
reply
5 points

According to Wikipedia, only 2 people have ever been charged under the act in over 200 years and neither was convicted, so it’s not really a law at that point

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

If the law is not enforced it’s no different than there being no law, choosing not to enforce the law or delay enforcement because the perpetrator is wealthy or politically connected happens in oligarchy not democracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Didn’t stop Trump when he talked with Netanyahu during his visit… Why would the rest of his family think they’re any different?

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Yes

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

SCOTUS:

Obviously our liberal “friends” have never read the constitution. It clearly states that anything Trump or his family does is constitutional.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 10K

    Posts

  • 197K

    Comments