160 points

how is this not on the front page of every news source?!

permalink
report
reply
122 points
*

Because Trump is firehosing. There’s too much bullshit and fascism, and it would consume any media outlet that reports on it, making the news media appear to be biased.

Look at the complaints from the debate, “Oh wahh, they fact-checked me but didn’t fact-check Harris!” and now CBS is saying they won’t fact-check the VP debate. They keep doing it because it works.

Trump is floundering. His poll numbers aren’t looking great, and his VP keeps fucking up campaign events, people are leaving his rallys on camera behind him, so Trump is just going to shout whatever bombastic bullshit comes to mind in the hopes that it will drown out the other stories. And it fucking works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

… people are leaving his rallys on camera behind him, …

Of note, those people who sit right behind the speaker and get to be on camera - those people are specifically selected to be there.

Even the people who have been chosen to be Trump’s backdrop are leaving early.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points
*

His poll numbers aren’t looking great,

They’re not looking anywhere near as bad as they should. 44% for Trump and 48% for Harris doesn’t mean much when the states’ election infrastructure has been systematically compromised by Republicans and the election all depends on a few swing states. There’s still a good chance of Trump being the next President.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I agree with that. People need to vote like democracy is at stake.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

“Oh wahh, they fact-checked me but didn’t fact-check Harris!” and now CBS is saying they won’t fact-check the VP debate.

And if there weren’t already enough examples that our media are complicit in this clownshow, this puts it over the top for sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Wouldn’t say it totally works. Yeah some people vote for him but he’s literally only losing ground, Trump hasn’t actually made any political gain since his initial election, maybe Jan 6th and maybe getting shot at.

But other than that, he really only loses support at least from what I see in my swing state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I hope you’re right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Like so much Trump says and does, it’s Republicans demanding a state of affairs that already exists, but that we’re socially ashamed of.

Ask the guy in the NYC subway who caught a bullet for being adjacent to a turnstile jumper if we have violent policing. Ask George Floyd. Ask Sandra Bland. Ask Rodney King.

It already exists. We already functionally endorse it. We already put these acts is brutality on the front page.

We just don’t feel good when we see it. That’s what Trump wants to change. He wants us to view domestic police brutality like Israelis treat genocide in Gaza and Lebanon. He wants us to clap.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I’ve got a buddy who had the shit beaten out of him by Austin PD back in the '90s. He’s A REALLY big white guy and the police cited his size as the reason they felt threatened by him.

He fortunately won his lawsuit when he was able to provide evidence that the police beat him up because it seemed like a fun challenge to take down someone so large.

Trump’s call for violence is one that cops nationwide will gladly answer

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Trump’s call for violence is one that cops nationwide will gladly answer

Yup.

Protests about police brutality are met with wave of police brutality across US

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

So what if it were on the first page? Do you think that republicans who know how to read would care?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It was the Republican who knows how to Read’s idea in the first place!

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Because they want Trump to win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points
permalink
report
reply
6 points

This is very insightful. Ty for the link.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I’m from Germany, where this shameful history is part of our past. But even today, unfortunately, and even in my home country, there are resurgent forces that want exactly that once more: Hatred against everything that seems foreign to them. Don’t let that happen anywhere in the world. Let history speak for itself and let us be wiser this time: never again this inhumanity, never again racism against whomever it may be directed at.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I was thinking night of long knives, considering who Trump says is out to get him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Trump’s running the 1s platform.

1 vote and you won’t need to vote anymore.

1 hour they’ll fix crime.

1 day with dictatorship and Trump will fix the rest.

This is a completely normal thing to campaign on and not at all concerning.

permalink
report
reply
43 points
*

Trump told the crowd, “One rough hour, and I mean real rough, the word will get out, and it will end immediately. End immediately. You know, it’ll end immediately.”

Trump continues to think it all works on fear and “respect”.

On X, formerly Twitter, Ben-Ghiat posted, “I study dictators and this chills me. Given all his comments in the past about executing people & shooting looters and his admiration for leaders specialized in mass repression, it’s not hard to imagine what ‘one really violent day’ would mean.”

permalink
report
reply
34 points

Ok so can we start with a really rough day of policing election fraud, inciting insurrection, business fraud, not paying suppliers, sexual assault, stealing classified government documents, and shitting your pants in public. Then maybe the word will get out and we won’t have to go further.

… Ok maybe not the last one. That’s just unfair.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 189K

    Comments