Among all voters, the number approving is even lower at 4% and the disapproval is 57%

Even among those who described themselves as MAGA Republicans, it was 9% approval to 28% disapproval

-2 points
Mother Jones - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Mother Jones:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/09/gop-voters-project-2025-nbc-poll/

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
57 points

And yet almost all of them (I’m being generous here) will still obediently vote R in the election. Gotta support the team!

permalink
report
reply
36 points

The GOP Governor of Ohio wrote a NY Times op-ed essay on how nice Springfield is and how the Haitians there are all fine people. He went on to say that he’s voting for Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

DeWine is the epitome of the person who doesn’t agree with fascism but would rather support it than anyone an inch to his left

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

when their political affiliation becomes their identity and they got that identity because their parents were republican and their parents parents were republican. there’re already too far gone and have zero critical thinking skills.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

and the remaining 2/3 of the electorate is unsure about depriving millions of americans of basic welfare, equality and security, but it’s probably fine

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Given the stark polling, I’d imagine most of the unsure people likely just haven’t heard of Project 2025 / don’t know what’s in it

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

According to the new poll, less than a quarter of those surveyed—23 percent—had never heard of it or were unsure of how they felt. Polling released in July by progressive firm Navigator Research showed that more than half of Americans reported being familiar with Project 2025—double the amount who reported familiarity with it just a month earlier.

You guys… we live in a post-reading society /hj

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The new poll does not distinguish between unsure of how one feels and never heard of project 2025. (I did dig into the poll document itself too)

The poll looking at number familiar with project 2025 was months ago from a different poll

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

it’s such a weird thing to be on top of foreign politics when people who are the most concerned with the outcome of that vote are oblivious to what’s at stake

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

For anyone who has a bit of time, I highly encourage volunteering for the campaign. Many of the methods of volunteering are about educating voters

Find opportunities to volunteer for dems around you

EDIT: looks like you might not be in the US, but still recommend volunteering for progressive parties around you if you can

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I felt the same way watching AfD win seats in Germany’s election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Damn… I didn’t really expect that

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 7.7K

    Posts

  • 136K

    Comments