You know, the same thing happens to me every time the FBI takes my phones.

91 points

I really hate to defend this guy because he clearly sucks. But honestly: smart move. Your phone password and much of the contents of your phone should be considered speech and you shouldn’t be compelled to testify against yourself. That said, if this phone was government property then he shouldn’t have been the only one capable of unlocking it, which is a policy failure.

permalink
report
reply
52 points

He’s a cop, of course he knows how law enforcement will go through and find something incriminating

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Recorded speech about engaging in crimes is often acceptable evidence. It’s probably the same with written messages.

I guess it’s up to the accused to prevent law enforcement from acquiring what they said, whether it be preventing recording, preventing police from sifting through mail or unsecure communications, or preventing police from acquiring the accused’s copy of potentially illegal communications. Which he is currently attempting.

I don’t blame him for trying, and would agree on a lesser extent that he is right to prevent self incriminating now. But copied communication as acceptable evidence is pretty settled in law by now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I work in IT. Five bucks says their government-issued phones can be unlocked by an MDM (Mobile Device Management) profile.

permalink
report
parent
reply
77 points

“Adams claimed that after he learned about the investigation into his conduct, he changed the password,” and he “increased the complexity of his password from four digits to six,” the document reads. Adams said he did this to stop members of his staff “from inadvertently or intentionally deleting the contents of his phone because, according to Adams, he wished to preserve the contents of his phone due to the investigation.”

Sure thing, bud.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

Wow… I could dream up more realistic excuses in middle school.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

6 digits is brute force hackable in about 1 second.

Also, isn’t lying to the FBI another crime?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Clone.

Repeat.

Also, cellebrite.

Edit: if people think forensics uses the actual device that would severely hinder any investigation.

That would risk tampering, or destroying evidence.

Copies are made.

Technology exists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

No worries, Eric, they’ll figure it out for you.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

With a pipe wrench

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

A $5 wrench.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I wouldn’t be surprised if at some point, Eric Adams said something a long the lines “If you didn’t do anything illegal, you have nothing to hide”.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

If anyone ever takes my phone and asks for the password, I forgot it. Guilty or innocent, doesn’t matter.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

You’re right. But it’s not his phone. It’s his employer’s phone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Then they shouldn’t need the password…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I can’t disagree with that. Which makes it worse - tampering with evidence.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 190K

    Comments