138 points

The small print at the bottom of the page is quite something.

Trump Watches are not designed, manufactured, distributed or sold by Donald J. Trump, The Trump Organization or any of their respective affiliates or principals. TheBestWatchesonEarth LLC uses the “Trump” name, image and likeness under a paid license agreement which may be terminated or revoked according to its terms. Trump Watches are intended as collectible items for individual enjoyment only, not for investment purposes. The images shown are for illustration purposes only and may not be an exact representation of the product. These watches are not political and have nothing to do with any political campaign

permalink
report
reply
55 points

Trump Watches are intended as collectible items for individual enjoyment only, not for investment purposes. The images shown are for illustration purposes only and may not be an exact representation of the product.

So they are absolute trash.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Bulk ordered from Ali Express

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Wait we’re allowed to just declare that something isn’t political? Neat! I declare access to abortions to be non-political as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

“These watches are not designed to give accurate time and should not be used to tell time or keep track of time.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

🤔🤔🤔

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

“TheBestWatchesonEarth” I can already imagine how tasteful the watches are based on the company name

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Oh, so these are AI images of a watch that doesn’t exist yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Probably the least political offer I’ve ever read

Neither politics nor candidates come anywhere close to mind

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

Must be gathering cash for one of his whores. Maybe that Jigsaw chick.

permalink
report
reply
83 points

It’s him. He’s the whore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Wow, these are some truly hideous watches. This has got to be a money laundering scheme or something. No one actually interested in watches would spend six figures on one of these.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

It’s not for people interested in watches. It’s for people interested in seeing a large economy having a figurehead who is a complete fucking waste of space.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Honestly, better than I was expecting. I was expecting gaudy gold, maybe with some (probably fake) diamonds. You know, Trump’s ugly style. These just look fairly plain and cheap. I agree it does look like money laundering because they’re far from nice, but they’re just not as ugly as I expected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It does look like it has some fake looking gemstones on the outside ring. Soooo trashy

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Gotta take the rubes for everything they’re worth. I wonder how many inheritances that fucking guy has sacked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I was like $100.00 is not that bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

She’s so bad at sounding like a typical person.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I think she should go to a donut shop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

She doesn’t even care enough to ask someone how long they’ve worked there. It would be, “give me 12 donuts and do not talk to me, peasant.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

that would still be better than vance tho.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
15 points

This is probably the only watch douchier than a Hublot. Even Richard Mille can’t hope to match this.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 9K

    Posts

  • 162K

    Comments