I haven’t heard anything in months. Maybe there is legal trouble?

37 points
*

My wife has one, it’s been a long time since she have talked about it though.
She used to mention when improvements were made.

Edit: Pinephone.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

One what? Pine64 is a company with a bunch of different products

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Sorry silly me, a Pinephone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Which distro does she have installed?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Mobian of course she says.
( She uses Debian on the computer )

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You have an amazing wife. Now install Gentoo on her device

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Definitely a long way off from how active they were a year or two ago.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I mean their August 2023 blog post was basically “We were busy, sorry for not posting updates.” So considering you can still normally buy and receive a product from them, they are probably busy again. (or don’t want to write blog posts) Which doesn’t mean Pine64 is dead, just that you won’t get updates.

Imo it’s good that they aren’t releasing another useless product but it’s a shame that the Pine Note isn’t available for purchase now that it has matured. Would have been such a cool device.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Feels like there’s a lot of that going around.

It seems like every FOSS project I stumble across these days hasn’t had a commit in at least a year.

Not the huge ones, obviously, but anything even slightly off the mainstream.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’ve noticed that too. Is it related to covid you think? As in it was like this before and now we’re returning to normal progression as people rebuild social connections and lose time. Or is it that the whole dev economy is changing with layoffs and such that devs are leaving the industry altogether? Or something else even?

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Pine64s “problem” was they only ever did the hardware. Like they sponsor some software, but they make and sell hardware. They gained a lot of popularity from the Pinephone, but very little changed internally at Pine64. They’re still the same they always were

permalink
report
reply
21 points

What? I get really annoyed at hardware companies that do software. Like, first thing I’m gonna do with anything I buy is wipe it and install my own OS. Why would you waste so much time making a forked OS?

Do one thing, and do it well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think you are confusing “making another fedora fork for a laptop brand” with “porting a booloader to the device” or “writing a driver for the screen”. Simply put you would not be able to use the hardware without the software. Outsourcing it to the community makes the hardware cheaper but the sideeffect is that the software will be crappy even after years of development. For some reason people aren’t very keen on writing the low level stuff.

If you compare the Espruino smart watch to the Pine64 smartwatch, it’s a night and day difference. My guess is that it’s because Espruino handles the low level stuff and let community do the fun stuff, while Pine64 leaves everything on the community. Imo you need a fulltime developer who actually spends time looking in the datasheet and figuring out, how to properly put the PineTime to sleep, not just people who peek into the docs every Saturday.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Oh yeah, I’m not referring to drivers. I’m thinking of things like PureOS

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

for example to make sure you have got drivers.

but then, you need software for less computer-like devices too, like a smart watch or earbuds. do you immediately reflash those too? and who will make the software?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

We’re talking about low level software that makes the hardware usable here, the reason that Raspberry Pi is the king of this market is because they have the software support that allows their hardware to just work. Pine64 relies on the community to do this for each of the boards they release.

Pine64’s most successful products have been the ones they release as full products with working firmware.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Especially when software already exists, it prevent duplicating efforts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sure thats true as long as the basic support on compatibility is there, but as I understand it Pine is so hardware-only that they make it hard for other projects to even support their hardware, i.e. with lacking drivers as the other comment addressed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Just looking at the Infinitime repo, they seem alive and well, even changing EoL chips

https://github.com/InfiniTimeOrg/InfiniTime/releases/

https://github.com/InfiniTimeOrg/pinetime-mcuboot-bootloader/releases/tag/1.0.1

permalink
report
reply
8 points

I was under the impression that infinitime was more of a community effort than a pine64 effort?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It is, but they are talking about the hardware in these last release notes, about a chip that will get replaced in the actual hardware, therefor i don’t think they are completely dead! Long lice Pine64

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It is the same/similar problem that Nokia/Maemo and Sailfish/merOS have all had.

Some things are binary-blobs + NDAs and many things are still locked, the OSS community can only do so much before they hit the commercial roadblocks.

We need a complete CoreBoot + OSS silicon-chips + OSS firmware + all-community / all-commercial dual production lines.

The open-source-based company should be able to sell both the commercial locked-version and the oss-all-unlocked-version with the ability to switch infinitely between the two models.

But the world of electronics rarely will ever work or reach that level of interoperability , repairability or recycling this way. Not for a long time maybe in some distant future.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We need a complete CoreBoot + OSS silicon-chips + OSS firmware + all-community / all-commercial dual production lines.

Where are the gaps?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Check out their matrix https://pine64.org/community/

permalink
report
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 8.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 40K

    Comments