8 points

My money’s on analog optical computing replacing GPUs as the hardware used for inference / generation. Analog computing in general is promising, and I look forward to seeing how the chips fall re: training.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

I can’t tell if this article is satire or not

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Both the article and the pushback are kind of silly here — the dGPU’s heyday was over a decade ago, back when “serious gamers” had a custom built PC on their desk and upgraded their GPU every two years at a minimum.

Back in 2008, gaming on a laptop started to become a possibility, and dGPUs were part of that story — but for the most part, good luck swapping out your GPU for a newer model; it generally wasn’t so easy to do on a laptop.

THAT was the beginning of the end for dGPUs.

By 2015, I had a laptop with both an iGPU and a dGPU. eGPUs were just appearing on the market as a way around the lack of upgradeability, but these were niche, and not required for most computing tasks, including gaming.

At the same time, console hardware began to converge with desktop hardware, so gaming houses, who had for over 20 years driven the dGPU market, fell into a slower demand cadence that matched the console hardware. GPUs stagnated.

And then came cryptomining, a totally new driver of GPUs. And it almost destroyed the market, gobbling up the hardware so that none was available for any other compute task.

Computer designers responded by doubling down on the iGPU, making them good enough for almost all tasks you’d use a personal computer for.

Then came AI. It too was a new driver for GPUs, and like crypto, sucked some of the oxygen out of the PC market… which switched to adding iNPUs to handle ML tasks.

So yeah; GPUs are now for the cloud services market and niche developers; everyone else can get their hands on a “good enough” SoC with enough CPU, GPU and NPU compute to do what they need, and the ability to offload to a remote server cluster for weightier jobs.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Show me an iGPU that will compete with my 3080ti.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, dgpus have been for niche applications for decades, I didn’t read the article, but the parent comment is vastly overestimating igpu capabilites

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Show me non-niche software that needs more than a modern iGPU can provide. Your 3080ti can blast two screens of 4k video at 120fps HDR… and so can my iGPU.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I play video games. Those aren’t exactly niche.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

over a decade ago, back when “serious gamers” had a custom built PC on their desk and upgraded their GPU every two years at a minimum.

Hey man, I’m old, but I still have a custom built gaming PC on my desktop and a fairly recent GFX card (3070 ti). Although I’d say I only update my card maybe once every 3-5 years depending on necessity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

This is the real write up right here. Article is pretty meh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Ich hab mir ne NVidia Titan X gekauft für LLMs, und hab das Gefühl dass das ein absoluter Fehlkauf war.

Der Energieverbrauch muss absurd sein, moderne Chips sind bestimmt extrem viel besser.

Es war halt so 1000€ günstiger, glaube ich. Vielleicht bin ich da aber auch falsch

permalink
report
reply

Technik

!technik@feddit.org

Create post

die Community für alles, was man als Technik beschreiben kann

Beiträge auf Deutsch oder Englisch

Community stats

  • 914

    Monthly active users

  • 830

    Posts

  • 1.1K

    Comments