-2 points
Daily Beast - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Daily Beast:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-trump-aide-says-calling-kamala-harris-childless-is-proving-to-be-a-bad-strategy

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply
112 points
*

The GOP have been huffing “traditional family values” for so long they thought everyone did too. They make a jab at Harris for not fitting the traditional family values, which they thought would land with the public, but it fell flat because “traditional family values” includes the subjugation of women, abuse of children, and a big helping of toxic masculinity. Naturally those ideas are rejected by the majority of Americans today.

The GOP got high on their on supply.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

There’s this scene from The Boys S4– so spoilers abound— wherein Homelander spouts the conservative talking points to would-be donors behind closed doors and is told “yeah yeah save the talking points for the rabble.”

Which is great, as S4 is set in the stage where the Trump analogue takes power, but somehow we’re past that point irl. The guys in charge don’t seem to just be saying it for the “rabble” anymore. Sucks how far the right has moved in just a few years without losing significant support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
93 points

I’m permanent guardian to my niece. Asswipe says I’m not invested in the future because I didn’t birth her.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Well in the eyes of the GOP you could just tear up the paperwork and walk away at any time, so clearly it doesn’t count.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I don’t have children. I don’t plan to have children. I don’t think any of my partners did or do either. People can be invested in the future because they don’t want future generations to suffer. If you need to have younger dependents for that, it mostly makes me think you have a rather narrow world view.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

People can be invested in the future because they don’t want future generations to suffer. If you need to have younger dependents for that, it mostly makes me think you have a rather narrow world view.

These are the same people whose only reason for not murdering people is the belief that they will be tortured for eternity if they do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

My reason for not murdering someone is the cops, also retribution and all that fun stuff. But seriously I would kill my father if it wasnt for the legal system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Can Trump’s aides run in his place? They seem way smarter.

permalink
report
reply
-94 points

Eh. I’m voting for Trump but certain people around him (like Laura Loomer) might literally have me voting for Kamala if they were to replace him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Assuming you’re not trolling… Seriously, why?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-61 points

Mostly the economy (specifically tax cuts and support for domestic oil and gas production), border security, national security and foreign affairs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Enjoy the downvotes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-36 points

I feast on the downvotes from this community lol, they ain’t new to me

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Eh. I’m voting for Trump

I mean… really?

It’s not a question of political views, I was a midwestern conservative growing up, back before the dixiecrats hijacked the party and drove it into a ditch,

Vote libertarian until they finally kick the trash out, sending a message matters more than anything else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points

I have great respect for libertarianism, but it’s a little too extreme for me. There need to be federal institutions at some scale (even if they should be minimized, like Trump I too am a Federalist)

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Look, folks, a temporarily embarrassed billionaire. They’re the only people that benefit economically from Trump’s policies. Check your 2016 taxes paid divided by income and your 2023 taxes paid divided by income. The reason you paid more taxes in 2024 is Trump’s tax reform. Did you get more for your tax dollars now? I don’t feel like I did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
99 points

>demonizes childless cat ladies
>won’t let you get IVF
>makes memes about protecting cats

what do they want from us

permalink
report
reply
33 points

They want you barefoot and pregnant, doing dishes and being your husband’s sex toy when he’s not fucking his secretary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

We’re just not weird enough to understand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I think they are just authoritarians. They just want people to fall in line, follow orders, and shut up. Logical inconsistencies in their arguments or policies? Well fuck you logic is for nerds.

Don’t want to play ball well too bad you’re probably a witch anyway. Don’t think the Earth is the center of everything? Do not pass go and straight to jail!

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.9K

    Posts

  • 121K

    Comments