J.D. Vance brushed off Laura Loomer’s racist comments, despite being married to an Indian American woman.

J.D. Vance would apparently rather protect Donald Trump’s decision to pal around with self-described “proud Islamophobe” and 9/11 conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer than stand up for his own wife.

Trump has been seen with Loomer several times over the last couple of weeks, with the pair getting eyebrow-raisingly close (Trump’s hand has been spotted in the small of Loomer’s back) while Melania Trump has largely remained out of the limelight. Loomer attended a 9/11 memorial service with Trump and also accompanied him to the presidential debate.

In an interview Sunday with NBC News, Vance was asked directly about his and his wife Usha Vance’s opinions on some of Loomer’s overt racism, including her claim that Vice President Kamala Harris’s ascendency to the Oval Office would make the White House “smell like curry.” But Vance wouldn’t take a stand against the alt-right ally.

“Do I agree with what Laura Loomer said about Kamala Harris? No, I don’t,” Vance continued. “I also don’t think that this is actually an issue of national import. Is Laura Loomer running for president? No. Kamala Harris is running for president, and whether you’re eating curry at your dinner table or fried chicken, things have gotten more expensive thanks to her policies.”


Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

11 points

Depending on his wife’s level of patience, I give this guy at most two years before he gets divorce papers in the post.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

and when that happens, I guarantee she’ll then be smeared all over the right wing news as some greencard grabber who only married him to infiltrate america.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Laura Loomer does not peg Donald Trump, These rumors are completely unsubstantiated, we will find the people that are spreading the rumor that Laura Loomer pegs Donald Trump and tell them to stop the fake news!

permalink
report
reply
99 points

He defends a racist by using a racist statement. And Republicans don’t even blink.

permalink
report
reply
4 points
*

[Deleted due to community feedback]

Edit: i didn’t make it clear enough. This is parody combining the racist shit JD just said with the racist shit Trump said previously. In no way does this reflect my actual viewpoint.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

This is wildly racist, and also full of shit. She went to a historically black university, joined a black sorority, and has always been open about her dual Black/Indian heritage.

Your racist talking points aren’t going to land here, fuckhead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

That was meant to be parody exaggerating the racist shit JD just said and combining it with the racist shit Trump said previously. I didn’t make that clear enough, clearly. This does not reflect my viewpoint whatsoever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I think many of the people downvoting and/or reporting you (I did both) are aware that you’re joking. The problem is that your joke isn’t funny. It’s wildly offensive and racist.

I get what you’re saying, “I don’t actually believe the racist stuff I said,” but we’re concerned with the part of that thought that you’re glossing over: racist stuff you said. Probably should just delete your comment.

Just realize that comedy doesn’t give you carte blanche to shout racist stereotypes and move on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Humor wasn’t the goal. Making apparent the racism of Vance and Trump’s words was. If repeating back the racism someone else used in order to deride them somehow applies that same racist stigma onto me, I would argue that your priorities are misplaced. If I had directly quoted them and cited the quotation would the reaction have been the same? Because it amounts to the same level of disconnect from the words to me. But whatever. Not a hill I care to die on. I’ll delete it. Didn’t mean to upset anyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply

How is that a racist statement?

I also eat curry (actually made some myself last saturday) and I’m a white cis male, so the least likely target of any -cism (at least any that can be taken seriously)?

Should I feel offended by that statement? lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Because Harris is both Black and Indian heritage and curry and fried chicken are the two foods most stereotypically associated with each aspect of her heritage. It’s not like he picked two random foods.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Wait

Fried chicken is associated with black people in the US?

Are you shitting me?

Over here in Europe it’s considered redneck-food lol

Also thanks for explaining and not downvoting like the other toxic fucks here. Lemmy really is becoming reddit 2.0, huh?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

My God how I envy your innocence.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Idk it apparently gets you downvoted here

I switched to Lemmy because I was told it would be less toxic than Reddit. But I guess that was a fucking lie.

Might as well switch back to reddit if this keeps up. At least They don’t support genocidal regimes there there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Oh man, you just made the mistake of pointing out that you’re white…

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Wait. Did he just add the fried chicken to the reference? Loomers was just curry, wasn’t it? Wtf JD

permalink
report
reply
9 points

If that’s an impromptu response, that’s a sort of natural racism that 4chan would be envious of.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Next up he’ll add watermelon too.

They love adding racist dogwhistles don’t they?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think we can stop calling it a dog whistle when they start just saying it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Very memorable, wasn’t it?

Now Lemmy World will be talking about him for days!

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Now that we’re discussing Laura Lamer and her presumed copulation with Diaper Drump….

What happened to Melanomia, that faded model and speech duplicater that happened to be the official wife? Anyone seen her in the last few months?

permalink
report
reply
36 points

On one hand, Melania is a horrible person in her own right. On the other, I don’t think any other single person has done more to humiliate and infuriate Cadet Bonespurs.

I liked it when she refused to move to Washington and when she made the White House look like a torture chamber for Christmas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Melanie is likely doing what she truly loves. Shopping in Manhattan and spending time with Hans the yoga instructor, while Trump is far far away

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

More importantly, no more creepy comments about Ivanka. Now we know why: Ivanka is too old for Trump

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

She has some sort of book coming out and is set to do dozens of interviews but I’m sure they’ll be extremely controlled publicity interviews where she just says cliches.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.9K

    Posts

  • 121K

    Comments