-18 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

This guy is a Trump voter who tried to kill a politician before an election. He’s a gutter person. It’s karmic that the fanatics Trump whipped up would now target him, but idk how we’re cheering for this. It’s sad, scary, and ominous imo.

Call me a bleeding heart liberal I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

We are cheering because people are trying to kill an insane man hellbent on destroying this country. Your heart isn’t bleeding because you value the life of one person over the lives of the people he has been responsible for destroying and those who will be destroyed if he continues to live. You’re myopic and afraid of conflict.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

We are cheering because people are trying to kill an insane man hellbent on destroying this country

Your cheering for an assassination attempt shows that your country is already well and truly fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Myopic would be not realizing supporting political violence will get people you support killed too. We need to hope that it can be made harder to kill candidates and those in office going forward.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Conflict doesn’t equal armed insurrection or the assassination of political leaders. He can lose at the ballot box and die penniless. I’m fully aware of what a monster he is. Are we cool with assassinating other R’s? Some are just as vile if not more than him.

Where’s the line? Who gets to decide who lives and dies? You? I’m sure you’re a nice and reasonable person, but I don’t trust you with that decision, let alone a gun nut, conspiracy theorist Trump voter. How long before someone retaliates and turns a gun on [insert favorite politician here]? Was the cycle of violence worth it then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Last I’d read, there’s no consensus that he actually voted for Trump. Dude’s views were all over the place.

Regardless, if someone takes Trump out, I will literally lose no sleep or tears. I don’t advocate for violence, but MAGA sure as fuck does. Reap what you sow and all that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

He claimed to have voted Trump, and probably just because he was “anti-establishment” judging by his other eclectic and conspiratorial views.

https://amp.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article292534604.html

I wouldn’t mourn for Trump, but I’d mourn for our country. This isn’t the right way

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
Miami Herald - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Miami Herald:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article292534604.html

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply
-3 points

Herooo

permalink
report
reply
20 points

You have $100 and get to bet it on, is the shooter a:

A) drag queen

B) immigrant

C) republican

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Trick question? he seemingly switched to a D after voting for Trump in 2016.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

From his social media he was supporting Tulsi Gabbard and then later Nikki Haley.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Thoughts and prayers. Also…he voted for tRump in 2016.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 175K

    Comments