126 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
65 points

Well, the issue will be developers of other apps would force us to re-google since any build of the app would be useless unless installed from the play store…

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

ReVanced patching will become more common

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

For every single app where the developer tries this?

Yeah right. That’s unsustainable.

They’ll also just increase ways for the integrity to verify it hasn’t been patched. This announcement already says they’re checking the app’s binary for tampering.

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points

MicroG devs are working on fakeing play integrity api since 2023: https://github.com/microg/GmsCore/issues/2050

it seems that play integrity continue to change internally day to day… He is waiting that google stabilize it. Then will be a pull request.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Are they? Other comments in different PRs seem to indicate they have no intention of trying to subvert play integrity. Is there something more recent than this that indicates they’re trying?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

You can degoogle on Android you know. Takes some effort, but the end result is better than moving into a walled garden.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You can degoogle on Android you know.

only if your device is supported. Most aren’t…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Something AOSP like Lineage OS

You can install MicroG if you need play compatibility

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

time to demand apps in other repositories. Bonus if it’s f-droid compatible

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Some paid apps actually prevents the user from using it if it’s not paid from Google play

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Are you suggesting such an app can be purchased outside Google play but not used?

Having an app check a license server isn’t exactly new. Google play is simply a third party license server.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No, but you can download the APKs anyways. Which is most likely exactly why this is being implemented. I doubt many developers of free apps are going to turn this feature on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes they will. This tool would force users to always use the Play Store which would increase the download count on their app, which would help its ranking in the Play Store. Every last single developer is incentivized to use this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The App Lounge from /e/OS has access to the play store if you choose to log in to Google. It is possible (but not recommended because of a possible ban) to purchase stuff, I haven’t done that yet, but some apps want to talk to Google to see if it was purchased and that gives an error.

For example, Wavelet can’t unlock paid status, All-In-One Calculator gives the option to link an email so it can restore paid status, Nova Launcher uses a different app to restore paid status so it works as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Kinda makes sense. A paid app on Google Play is a license to download the .apk file(s). Then a user could make copies, and without DRM, it’d be the same situation as with copyrighted movies and whatnot.

I’m not saying I support them, it’s just that they are like this for a reason

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points

Well that’s an easy fix. I just won’t use those apps.

permalink
report
reply
54 points

So no banking apps for you? I agree that this is shit, but pretending we are not hit by this is not helping.

Also, I don’t really use banking apps anyway because they already pull similar shit and I can get around it. For now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Is there any reason anyone would want to use an out of date banking app?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t know what you mean by that. Do you mean you rather use google pay?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Fortunately so far I haven’t come across a bank here in the Netherlands that wouldn’t work because my phone was rooted or because I’m running grapheneos. Hope it stays that way too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t.

I’ve seen people pay with something like that, but mostly it’s like an electronic checkbook. But yeah, browser is sufficient.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

There are, unfortunately, some features banks make mobile app exclusive (e.g. Zelle sometimes, check deposit).

I have a spare phone I keep in my drawer for when I really need a banking app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

My bank doesn’t have a web browser interaction ;(

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Correct. I’ve never used banking apps in the first place anyway. If my bank doesnt have a functional website then I would change banks.

And i say this not to be difficult or contrarian. I just really hate using apps for every business in existence and simply refuse to do so. Yes I have absolutely sacrificed convenience on many occasions due to this principal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Very good. I don’t like using apps for every little shitty website like discord or WebEx either.

Just know that this is a step forward in the direction of making it technically possible to force people to usw the app. Ask yourself if you trust them to not try and profit from this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Banking on the phone is absurd concept that I will never use

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Let’s hope we don’t have to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

With banking apps in particular this lock down is ultra-stupid.

Like, I have to use your super secure app, or I can just… visit your page in a web browser running on god-knows-what with whatever extensions in any computing environment or OS of my choosing? But not using Google Play is where they draw the line.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

Aw shit, it says this is supposed to detect when an app’s binary has been tampered with… That means it’s probably gonna be used to block stuff like ReVanced. I hope they can find a way around this that doesn’t require root.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Nah, revanced will just patch that out too!

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

I guess Revanced would eventually have a patch to skip this check. It can already spoof the client and such, why not this as well. I hope so

permalink
report
parent
reply

Android

!android@lemdro.id

Create post

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it’s in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it’s not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website’s name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don’t post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities
Lemmy App List
Chat and More

Community stats

  • 2.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 7.8K

    Comments