Donald Trump is probably fuming about this interview with former Project 2025 director Paul Dans.

One of the architects of the conservative Project 2025 manifesto demonstrated on CNN Monday the many ways in which Donald Trump is tied to the project.

Speaking to Kaitlin Collins on The Source, the project’s former director, Paul Dans, admitted that he’s visited Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate several times and has spoken with Trump’s campaign staff there, including the campaign’s co-chair Susie Wiles.

-16 points
New Republic - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for New Republic:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://newrepublic.com/post/185765/project-2025-leader-paul-dans-trump-ties-interview

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply
6 points

I have yet to see this thing say any source isn’t highly credible and factual. Which this source isn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
149 points

To the Christians, you can just write in “Jesus” if your conscience bothers you about voting for a convicted felon.

permalink
report
reply
65 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Rapist, and adulterer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-31 points
*

reminder: Jesus was also a convicted criminal

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Not for rape

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Trump wasn’t convicted of rape either. He’s a rapist, just not a convicted one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

This is a fucking weird bOtH siDEs

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
*

is Jesus on the ballot? first i’ve heard of this… don’t candidates have to be alive and also exist?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Youre too late, the republicans already plastered jesus all around their campaign. Its all it took to get their votes apparently

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

AK-47 Jesus

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
5 points

Conscience lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

Any mind demented enough to come up with 900+ pages of fascist garbage is not simply going to vanish into the wind. Trump disavowed it? Gosh, if it wasn’t for him lying non-stop for decades, I might buy that BS. Sorry, no sale.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Ehhh, I saw that interview yesterday, and I would not characterize it as Dans “confess[ing to] deep Trump ties.” NewRepublic is again not a very fair source.

permalink
report
reply

No shit.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 213K

    Comments