63 points

Here’s the page. There’s moments of specifics, and moments where I wish there was a bit more detail. But overall, now people shouldn’t be able to say she doesn’t have any policy positions. They still will though.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

It’s not that she doesn’t have them, it’s that she used to have better positions.

https://kamalaharris.medium.com/my-plan-for-medicare-for-all-7730370dd421

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

I agree that she’s not as progressive as I wish she was. But the overton window is stuck on a fascist dictator, so I’m going to vote for Kamala and we’ll call that progress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I say win 2024 and do good work.
Then get re-elected and go nuts on super progressive policy.

Massive taxes on billionaires (legit 50-70% and/or maybe maybe inheritance tax). Oh look at this! Tax on Extreme Wealth Massive taxes on land barons. (Limit to 2 or 3 per person. Then tax the hell out of vacant units and increasingly per unit over 3).
Medicare for all.
Abolish tipping culture. Increase minimum wage.
Abolish the corn welfare system. 95% of corn is not grown for human consumption. Let’s grow more of our own food.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Absolutely. We’ll get the status quo and we’ll like it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

presidents don’t make legislation and she’s not running for senate anymore

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Then I guess it was unnecessary to post policy

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

“Post your positions already!”

Posts positions

“Ugh, I can’t believe she posted her positions …”

It’s fair to ask for the positions, and fair to criticize the positions, the piece just reads like they are peturbed either way.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

the US corporate media is run by a bunch of right wing billionaires, I don’t think fairness is ever going to be in the cards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

They just don’t like Harris and they don’t have any reason why that they can talk about in public.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Welcome to earf

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

WOW LOOK AT THESE POLLS sponsored by draft kings

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It felt like the authors of the article accurately pointed out how skewed mainstream media’s portrayal is. I appreciate that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

We can have a policy based debate when the Republicans nominate a non-fascist candidate. Until then it doesn’t really matter.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

It is crazy how it took criticism for this to even happen. Someone you’re voting for should be able to list what their actual platform and agenda is. It helps to have it for record if you actually plan to attempt to hold these people in power accountable and not be on some weird parasocial worshiping stuff.

permalink
report
reply
31 points
*

the corporate media will never hold both parties to the same ballpark standard but like trump has pointedly denied involvement in project 2025 and he’s not once talked about a policy grounded in reality, but the point is this isn’t unusual its like the standard playbook. The only reason they went after Kamala on it is they don’t like her.

Voters should expect policies, like you said. Its crazy this is allowed in the first place and the media enables it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The media has been awful when it comes to Trump and letting him set and control the conversation. He has made it so normal just to lie without pushback. I could understand to some extent why listing a platform feels pointless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

In fact, I’d say that’s all they can do. No more advertising. You get a gvt funded web site where you post your resume and positions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Indeed. This applies to both parties, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

After criticism. Who the fuck cares. Only repubs. I want to know her policy too, but it’s not like I think she’s been dodging. They took time to craft it. Whatever, gotta be fair to both sides.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 187K

    Comments