It wouldn’t be fair to have your felony conviction negatively impact your opportunities. This is how justice works right?

-3 points
New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for New York Times:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/06/nyregion/trump-sentencing-delay-ruling.html

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply
0 points

I wonder if he’s delaying the sentence because he’s planning to lock him up for a few months.

This judge has had a strong bias to not look like he’s impacting the general election, and putting Trump in Rikers for a few months would have a much bigger impact than a fine.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I wonder if he’s delaying the sentence because he’s planning to lock him up for a few months.

My cynical brain tells me otherwise… after the election Trump would win which means he will not be sentenced at all or lose meaning nobody would care when the judge sentences him to the smaller wing of Maralardo for a week of house arrest

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hush money cases with non-violent first time offenders usually doesn’t result in prison time. So, if he got fines, house arrest and or probation, that wouldn’t be abnormal. Handling him with kid gloves would also be inline with how this judge has operated.

BUT, he also threatened the court and jury, and was constantly held in contempt. A lot of trial lawyers assume that, if he does get a few months in prison, his attempt to threaten and bully the court could be the reason for stiffer penalties.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This judge has had a strong bias to not look like he’s impacting the general election

All this time I thought they were there to uphold the law no matter who was on the other end of it, but I know, joke’s on me!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points

This is for the best, there would have been even no end of trouble if he wasn’t able to run for election because he was sent to jail or whatever.

It looks like Trump is almost certainly going to lose the election and when he does he’s going to jail. It’ll make November even more fun.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

It looks like Trump is almost certainly going to lose the election

Hilary was actually leading by roughly the same amount in 2016 by this point in the election campaign…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Hilary was actually leading by roughly the same amount in 2016 by this point in the election campaign…

Harris is doing much better if your metric is performance in battleground states…

Maybe popular nationwide polls are similar, I wouldn’t know, those are pointless so I don’t look at them.

Like, Hillary kept acting like she was going to win, but the numbers always showed the battlegrounds were too close, and while trump campaigned there, she kept doing fundraisers and victory laps in Cali.

Didnt take a genius to realize if one side stops running in a close race, the slower runner could win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

A jail sentence would make him a martyr and boost his fundraising.

EDIT: I’m not making excuses, only stating likely outcomes as I see them.

This fucking echo chamber…

Hate orange man! Will say nothing that might favor him (even if I don’t agree)! Give upvotes! Orange BAD!!

And that works every time with you easily manipulated children. Yes, I’m talking down to you. Big people say, “condescending”. Can you say condescending? It 's a BIG word! Try it yourself!

Often thought about making two up/down vote gathering accounts and posting results. There wouldn’t even be a shit storm, results would be ignored or banned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Just an excuse to avoid actually holding him accountable for anything.

Putting his ass in jail might harden his base but turn off those who were only party loyal out of tradition and might throw away their vote to a 3rd party. Hell, it might motivate more people to overcome voter suppression and vote for Dems if the system actually does something to hold him accountable. Increased turnout is more important than how hard conservatives mash the Trump button.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It looks like Trump is almost certainly going to lose the election and when he does he’s going to jail. they’ll overturn the results and refuse to certify in important states that they already have control over.

Fixed a slight mistake. :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

As much as I don’t want to agree, I partially do agree with your first statement and hope (regardless of how little faith I have in the justice system) that they are intentionally doing this so they can let the can of worms open if he loses and then take every single person they can down with him when they try to derail the results and attempt a 2nd coup.

It would be the icing on the cake, like you lost and you made a second attempt at it, there’s no fucking back tracking and now we have even more people that came out of the woods to help you and we are going to take you all down.

They could put him in jail now, but corruption is rampant, but maybe (sliver of hope) there is some quiet digging of graves for these people to fall into.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I hope you are correct.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It looks like Trump is almost certainly going to lose the election and when he does he’s going to jail.

Ankle bracelet at worst, more likely an easy for him to pay fine. Trump is never going to spend a day in prison, mark my words. And if I’m wrong I’ll celebrate along with everyone else about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

if he wasn’t able to run for election because he was sent to jail

That wouldn’t legally prevent him from running—Eugene Debs ran for president while in prison for protesting WWI.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
6 points

I’ve been saying this over a year ago… Trump will never see the inside of a jail cell. If you think the rich and famous are held to the same standards under the law, you should realize you just WANT to believe that, it is not something you’ll see in the real world

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 213K

    Comments