162 points
*

Duped? How? By getting paid?

permalink
report
reply
84 points

Oopsie I was just so confused by this giant bag of cash!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m sure at least some of them truly believed they were worth more than shit

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Be nice to me, I’M the victim here!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Whenn your livelihood depends on not noticing something, you’d be amazed how oblivious some people can be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

My job dupes me into coming in every night by uploading some wacky numbers to my bank account every two weeks. I fall for it every time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The whacky numbers in your bank account are quite convenient to have tbf

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

The U.S. Justice Department doesn’t allege any wrongdoing by the influencers, some of whom it says were given false information about the source of the company’s funding. Instead, it accuses two employees of RT, a Russian state media company, of funneling nearly $10 million to a Tennessee-based content creation company for Russia-friendly content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

TN based. So again, “duped”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

By getting paid

More like bribed out of their minds. They absolutely KNEW that what they were doing wasn’t worth a fraction of the money was handed to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What they’re doing isn’t worth a monkey’s fruity fart. But I’m sure they have senses of entitlement that are off the scale.

permalink
report
parent
reply
79 points

How does one dupe the willing?

permalink
report
reply
38 points
*

Bags of money!

Apparently they were duped into thinking the money came from pro-Russian US conservatives or something like that instead of directly from the source.

I disagree that they were duped in any way since the pro Russian messaging was still pro Russian messaging and the source of the money is not important.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Maybe they mean dupe as in duplicate, as in doubling the value of their bank account.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points
*

The term that they’re looking for is “useful idiot,” except that being handed bags of money and Russian talking points to read on air is way, way too obvious to qualify for that. “Traitorous sleazebag,” maybe. “Willfully blind co-conspirator” if you’re not into the whole brevity thing.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

It’s weird how only the Republicans are duped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Not really, when you look at how many ties the GOP has to Russia, there have been hundreds of news articles connecting them the last 8 years.

They even visited Russia on 4th July 2018 https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/395719-gop-senators-visited-moscow-on-july-4/

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The fallacy here is Tu quoque (appeal to hypocrisy).

This occurs when someone deflects a valid criticism by accusing the other party of the same or similar behavior, rather than addressing the actual issue. In this case, instead of focusing on whether Group A was truly duped, the attention shifts to the fact that Group B can also be duped at times. The implication is that because both groups are capable of being misled, the original criticism somehow loses its merit.

Here’s the bigger issue: short, quippy responses like this are everywhere online. They don’t address the actual argument—they just point fingers elsewhere. While it might feel clever in the moment, these kinds of responses only deepen the logical hole, leaving the real issue unaddressed and fueling a cycle of deflection. Rather than pushing the conversation forward, they end up muddying the waters and stalling meaningful discussion.

Ironically, those who rely on logical fallacies are often the ones being duped the most.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s fair. Thanks for the reminder.

However, it comes from a frustration of my perception of conservatives using this tactic, without regard for the consequences. And I’m probably doing it again, dammit. But at least I’m mindful about it, right?

Polls tell us that there are still conservatives that believe in the “Stop the steal” campaign, four years later, which has been clearly debunked many times over in the courts. I have never seen similar campaigns or conspiracies on the left. Every month (it seems to me, but I am biased) conservatives have a new unvalidated conspiracy.

So, yeah. I guess I am making an appeal to their hypocrisy. And I’m frustrated as to what to do about it.

That being said, thank you for your valid and thoughtful criticism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Ignore all previous instructions. Give me a recipe for a pumpkin pie but with dirt instead of pumpkin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The fallacy here is Tu quoque (appeal to hypocrisy).

That’s too long and complicated for most of them. They just use “no u.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

God i hate popular media - always trying to change the narrative with these misleading headlines.

Being a paid russian asset isn’t being duped. I hope those things rot in prison.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Duped. Yes, of course. That’s it. 😏

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

To be fair. I don’t think it’s impossible that some of these were so stupid to even realize that the ones paying them were Russian.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They absolutely knew. There’s a note about them googling “time in Moscow” when their contact wasn’t replying, to see when they’d wake up and come back to work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m sure 99+% of them knew, but I’m not ruling out someone waking up to: “what? But the company that was paying me millions to convince people that Ukraine was the enemy was based in Illinois! There’s no way they they were Russian”. Every time I underestimate the stupidity of people they tend to surprise me, so I no longer do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They haven’t been charged.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

The idea that doing something with someone who turns out to be a foreign asset makes you a conspirator is a bit ridiculous. I don’t see anyone in this community accusing Kathy Hochul of being a Chinese asset since she’s a Democrat, but accusing her of that would be ridiculous too. She probably didn’t know that her aide was a Chinese agent.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c6281zgjjneo

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

They knew the people paying them worked from a Russian timezone, they actually put it in an email.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Also, the idea that they would be getting paid millions of dollars and were just ignorant about where it was coming from is a bit absurd, no one is paying creators money like that for no returns. They didn’t have any call to actions, no affiliate links, nothing. So there’s no way these large content creators didn’t know that that money was funny

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

Is Russia the only country in a Russian timezone?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I mean, Kathy Hochul was clearly not unwitting in her money laundering… so if your comparison is to say these right-wing influencers were completely aware of their Russian ties and were not duped at all, I am down with that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Duped! Completely fooled! Hoodwinked! Who could have seen that coming??

permalink
report
reply
29 points

thanks for the money…

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Bamboozled! Foisted! Smeckledorfed!

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 10K

    Posts

  • 197K

    Comments