81 points

Is that cursed? Seems like the right privacy-focused default behavior and good design to me

permalink
report
reply
42 points

Imo the cursed part is that only some do that and not all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

It’s cursed because it happens silently, such that you might accidentally be deleting gps data you wanted to keep without noticing, for a reason that you probably wouldn’t think to check, probably instead erroneously filing a bug on the app for doing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Unless I’m uploading pictures to cloud storage I want GPS data filed off. I’d rather have some unnecessary bug reports targeting the wrong things then stalkers showing up at my door.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s the silently part that is the problem. If you want your personal pictures to be stored on your personal cloud, you’re a lot more likely to want location tags attached. If it just told you that it was stripping the tags, then you could disable it for certain apps, Rather than not noticing until you already deleted the original images from the phone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

So if I download an image from the web with GPS data, and then open it in an app that just reads images (so it doesn’t need location permissions)… That app (on some phones) gets a modified version of the file?

Which could make me think that the image doesn’t have location information.

Which could result in me uploading that file using a browser (that does have location permission turned on) to a website, and I think it’s safe to share because there’s no private information in the image, but my phone has conspired to mislead me.

Yes, that is cursed.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

I’m also worried that this is why gallery apps would require GPS location just for viewing photos (and their Metadata). Once gallery app has the permission, it can track your location in real time. It’s like this should be a separate permission rather than bundled together.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I agree completely.

I understand the motivation here — apps that lack location permission shouldn’t be able to get backdoor access to your location via your camera roll. That makes sense, because you know damn well every spyware social media company would be doing that if they could.

But the reverse is also true: apps that legitimately need to read photos and access all their metadata shouldn’t need to be granted full location access.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I was thinking this as well

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
9 points

That Javascript date indexing one is almost as cursed as fucking tire sizes.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

This included that as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Where can I find this library?

permalink
report
reply
6 points
6 points

that bcrypt one (ignoring everything past the first 72 bytes) is concerning

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yep, that’s why mastodon only allows for 72 characters maximum in passwords, I assume.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.7K

    Posts

  • 9.7K

    Comments