39 points

Not sacrificing your children to Baal is throwing your vote away

permalink
report
reply
20 points
*

If you choose to do anything but sacrifice your children to Moloch then you are by extension choosing to sacrifice your children Baal!

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

Oh, you’re seriously gonna pretend that moloch is better than baal is??? The hellfire demons eating civilians at random would be soo much worse if moloch were running things.

  • Voting third party (i don’t care if jesus promised to end the hellfire demons, his party won’t win, and is just a spoiler for the baal vote) - a vote for moloch.
  • Not prefacing a criticism of baal’s administration (cmon, we all know he realistically can’t stop the hellfire demons) without first saying you’ll vote for him? Also a vote for moloch.
  • Not voting - a vote for moloch.
  • Going to the bathroom? Believe it or not, also a vote for moloch.

/s

permalink
report
reply
14 points

I’m more of a Mephisto guy myself, but it never hurts to run Baal.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Well, Mephisto is not on the ballot so that would just be throwing away your vote

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

I would - but what children?
All have already been sacrificed to “the economy and profits”, we are waiting for people to be born to immediately sacrifice them bcs we are so much indebted to the great “the economy and profits”.

All hail “the economy and profits”, may it’s economy enslave us, and it’s profits get redistributed away from us.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

For the last couple centuries, Moloch has largely been a metaphor for “the economy and profits”.

Here’s an example from 1927

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I wonder when liberals will finally start organizing with Leftists outside the confines of Dem v Rep duopoly electoralism. Given that Reform is impossible, that leaves us with Revolution.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Liberals will march with fascists before thinking about looking left

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Macron’s already on that

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Ranked choice has been gathering some traction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Even on the minor, basest of chances it gains enough traction to make a tangible difference despite both parties working against it, how could a Socialist party make meaningful change without the other apparatus of the State like the military and legislative branches getting in the way?

Allende taught us what relying on electoralism will get you, even if you win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m not sure the problem is the electoral system so much as it is the people who vote.

I’m not saying that voting is bad, but even if you tore down the system and replaced it overnight with something better, it’s not gonna change the way people vote. They still vote in neoliberals and conservatives and fascists.

People on the left will have more options further left, but people on the right will have more options further right.

Fixing the electoral system is still a thing to strive for, and it’ll be a positive change; just temper your expectations

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Those are called checks and balances, and are there to make sure power is distributed. It’s good that you need buy in from lots of different people.

You don’t want to make a system where a few people can go drastically against the will of most people. So you’d first need to build wide support across the majority of the country or state. That’s the whole point of democracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 8.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.2K

    Posts

  • 42K

    Comments