You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-8 points

Those are called checks and balances, and are there to make sure power is distributed. It’s good that you need buy in from lots of different people.

You don’t want to make a system where a few people can go drastically against the will of most people. So you’d first need to build wide support across the majority of the country or state. That’s the whole point of democracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Those are called checks and balances, and are there to make sure power is distributed. It’s good that you need buy in from lots of different people.

Not quite. They are designed so that any genuine threat to Capitalist profits can be stalled out.

You don’t want to make a system where a few people can go drastically against the will of most people.

That’s what America already is and has been since its inception.

So you’d first need to build wide support across the majority of the country or state. That’s the whole point of democracy.

America is not a functional democracy, and needs to be overthrown and replaced with a functional democracy. The State needs to be entirely smashed and a new one built on top of the ashes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

One of the features of a functioning democracy would be ranked choice voting, or something like it, right? So I’d hope we could agree that that would be a good place to start.

As for other factors, what other sort of inherent structural issues to the system do you see, other than that the people currently in those balancing positions don’t agree with you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

One of the features of a functioning democracy would be ranked choice voting, or something like it, right? So I’d hope we could agree that that would be a good place to start.

We have very little chance of getting that just by trying to vibe it into existence, and even if we got it it wouldn’t suddenly mean that parties would cease accountability to the ultra-wealthy donors.

As for other factors, what other sort of inherent structural issues to the system do you see, other than that the people currently in those balancing positions don’t agree with you?

Outside of the fact that Capitalism will always mean the interests of Capital, not people, are going to be represented, there exists no real direct line from the workplace to the region to parliament, the will of the masses is not upheld because the masses do not have democratic participation that matters outside of local elections. The entire system needs to be restructured.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 8.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.2K

    Posts

  • 42K

    Comments