With just 15 days left until the scheduled Sept. 10 presidential debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump, negotiations between their two campaigns have hit an impasse over whether the candidates’ microphones will be muted when it is not their turn to speak, according to four people familiar with the issue.

In June, President Joe Biden’s campaign came to an agreement with Trump’s: There would be two debates — CNN’s on June 27 and ABC’s on Sept. 10 — conducted by mutually negotiated rules. One of the Biden team’s demands — which the Trump team agreed to — was that microphones “will be muted throughout the debate except for the candidate whose turn it is to speak,” as CNN announced on June 15.

“We have told ABC and other networks seeking to host a possible October debate that we believe both candidates’ mics should be live throughout the full broadcast,” Brian Fallon, the Harris campaign’s senior adviser for communications, tells POLITICO. “Our understanding is that Trump’s handlers prefer the muted microphone because they don’t think their candidate can act presidential for 90 minutes on his own. We suspect Trump’s team has not even told their boss about this dispute because it would be too embarrassing to admit they don’t think he can handle himself against Vice President Harris without the benefit of a mute button.”

76 points

Compromise: The off-screen mic should be at half volume and use a high-pitched chipmunk voice changer effect.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

I can get behind this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

permalink
report
reply
6 points

You are a gem

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s

L Y I N apostrophe

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

I am surprised its team Harris is the one who want unmuted microphones. The whole time I thought it woukd be Trump

permalink
report
reply
34 points

We won’t get to hear him say the N word if he’s muted. Just a thought.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Maybe they should mute the mics for the TV broadcast but also host a separate stream on the internet with full audio from both mics. That way Trump isn’t encouraged to interrupt, but we get to see him saying crazy shit if he tries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

If Donald drops a hard-R he will gain back some Repub voters who have been losing interest. Everyone else already knows he is racist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Many racists draw the line at a hard R. For some of them it hits to close to home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah he’s clearly dying to say it

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I could have sworn Ds wanted muted mics because trump was just talking over everyone and trampling the debate structure?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yeah but now they want to make him look bad. His team don’t think he can control himself when he’s not supposed to be talking, so they want him muted.

It’s ridiculous. Just stick with what was already agreed on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They want to let him make himself look bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It looks like they’re still doing the September debate with muted mics that was already agreed upon but they’re negotiating for a possible October debate without muted mics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I saw that statement too, and I agree. Yes it’s embarrassing for Trump’s team to admit that they need to mute him, but you can never underestimate how the guy can derail any discussion if you just allow him to talk over you, no matter how good a debater the person on the other side is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Make him look bad? Everyone knows he’s bad, and and half the country loves that. I don’t see how this is going to help Kamala. Unless she can hold her own and push back when he talks over her (which will be incessant), this move seems largely in his favor. I do hope I’m proven wrong, though!

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Definitely want to hear what he says under his breath, it will show everyone who he truly is (most of us already know though).

Same for Kamala obviously. Doubt she would say anything terrible. Mainly because she’s, I don’t know, respectable, descent, or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

He’s looking for any reason to weasel out of this because he knows he has no chance against a former prosecutor with a sound mind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Look back to the first 2020 Biden Trump debate. Up until Biden 2024 performance, it was arguably one of the worst debate performances of all time.

Harris wants to give him enough rope to hang himself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Perhaps someone with so little self control of their utterances should not in fact get to be elected to the highest office in the land. Just a thought.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I’d argue that should go for any gov’t office … which is why I’d never run in any election. :p

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

That went in the opposite direction from what I expected. I figured it’d be team orange that wanted the orange man to be able to interrupt, not that they’d fear him doing so. I’m on the side for hot mics as of now.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

I guess Kamala wins either way now. Either they get hot mics and she has the strength to use his bluster and rudeness against him, or they don’t, and she can calmly set out her points in complete sentences, with facts, without being interrupted. They’ve pre-cast his bullying interruptions as “lack of self-control” rather than “assertion of power.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.6K

    Posts

  • 113K

    Comments