US senator Elizabeth Warren dismisses JD Vance’s pledge that Trump would veto a nationwide ban if he were elected

-29 points

Eat shit Liz. I’ll never be interested in what you have to say again after the way you conducted yourself in the last two DNC primary elections. Go back to the shadows.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Be careful with that ax or you’ll grind it away to nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points
The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for The Guardian:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/26/elizabeth-warren-jd-vance-nationwide-abortion-ban-veto

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply
-32 points

But they’ll believe democrats that are claiming, again, they will preserve them? How many times does the boy need to cry wolf before he’s called out for being a liar?

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Such a bad faith argument.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

It’s not bad faith, the DNC has promised for 50 years to protect women’s rights, and did nothing but raise money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Democrats will try to preserve/create them. This has been seen over and over again. But to actually do this, they’ll need a Democratic majority in all three seats of power.

They’re fighting against Republicans who are actively doing everything they can to remove rights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

The role of Democrats is not to fight republicans but to keep actual leftists from gaining traction or power that threatens the existence of the duopoly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

And before someone jumps in with the tired ass " Obama had all three and didn’t codify Roe v Wade" argument, he was blocked by the more conservative members of his own party. Dems need not only a super majority, they need a super majority that can’t be hampered by a couple of holdouts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points
*

Or they could kill the filibuster which only takes a simple majority. Where were the cries from liberals to primary the pro life Dems that wouldn’t back the Freedom of Choice act? They were nowhere to be seen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Never underestimate stupidity.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

Republicans women think they will be the exception. They will be allowed because they aren’t sluts looking to be loose on Tinder.

These women are like all conservatives: thinking the rules exist only to oppress their opponents and will never be used against them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

The premise is ridiculous not just in that we couldn’t trust this coming from trumps own mouth, but also that it implies that a vice president has any control over any president, much less donald trump.

permalink
report
reply

Agreed. I mean I’m sure one of his biggest selling points to the Trump boys was that JD would have to eat a lot of shit to go from “Trump is America’s Hitler” to his VP pick. I’m sure Trump loves the idea that in taking the job JD would be publicly humiliated, it gives Trump a boosted feeling of superiority over him and feeds Trump’s narcissistic ego.

Edit - oops extra word. =(

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 175K

    Comments