More like this, please!

48 points

“He said … ‘If I just had another two months, I could get the money back,’” Mitchell told NBC News.

So the CEO was a gambling addict on top of being a clear idiot. How the fuck do these people fail their way into these positions and not get filtered out along the way?

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Because the meritocracy is a lie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Nepotism, usually

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

I guess they must have worked hard.

Lol I’m sorry I couldn’t even type that with a straight face 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Ass kissing or family member. Simple.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

This was a sad read. A gambling addict would have at least had a chance to make money. This guy just kept throwing money away other peoples money and never saw any returns.

I can’t believe someone at the bank didn’t question the strange wire transfers. Or that the guy who told him he was being scammed didn’t immediately reach out to the authorities.

Question: Wouldn’t the FDIC reimburse most of these people’s money?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

250k per, so not necessarily all your money if you had saved a lot

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Just go double or nothing a few times! Simple!

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

“Many victims will never fully recoup losses to their life savings and retirement funds, but at least we at the Department of Justice can see that Hanes is held criminally responsible for his actions.”

Can someone explain how they lost this money if the FDIC covered the missing $44M?

permalink
report
reply
16 points

FDIC only covers up to $250,000 per account. So if more than that were stolen from a single account…

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Gotta have lots of accounts. Like Minecraft chests. All lined up. 250k each.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think it has something to do with deposits vs investments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Maybe these were the bank investors they mentioned earlier in the article, but how do you even do such a thing? I’ve never heard of investing in local banks but maybe it’s a small town, small bank type of thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Shit like this is infuriating. I had someone try it on me and I strung them along to see what the scam was.

Basically “invest in my crypto and you can get 3x your money back.”

So I asked them “which crypto?” and I looked it up… they swore there were these limited windows where it spiked in value. Sell at that window and make 3x your money.

So I pulled 6 months worth of history… no spikes. None.

What they do is set up a fake payment portal where money goes in and nothing comes out.

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

“What they do is set up a fake payment portal where money goes in and nothing comes out.”

They actually go alot further in making the scam seem legit. They setup full trading platform apps that look legit. These apps are listed in the apple store and play store, they even have real real reviews.

You download the app yourself, you setup your profiles yourself. Everything seem legit because you actually setup the acounts.

You then put money into these “accounts”, you watch the value go up and down like it normally would on a stock market. Then when you are happy with your “investment”, time to withdrawal and there’s no money to take out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes, that’s exactly right. Though in some cases, they let the victim make one withdrawal after they get an initial “profit” just to make it appear legit. But never more than that one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Fascinating read about a horrible tragedy by a complete idiot. I also learned such a way of scamming is called pig butchering.

I’m not making fun of scammed people and feel for them, but I’m stunned how person X from NYC could believe that person Y from Hong Kong would want to marry them by never having met them. I mean, I can’t understand why you’d trust someone who you’ve never met and only been chatting to.

For example, if a real friend of yours had been a victim of email spoofing and the scammer started trading emails as your friend, then you’d be interacting with a “trusted” party and I can see it would be easier to fall for it, but these are random numbers from a country you’ve never visited (which no one can even certify even is the one they claim to be) and you start trusting them for no good reason.

There are tons and tons of scams, some much more subtle and/or targeted than others, but this stuns me in how generic and random it is (and how successfully it works)

permalink
report
reply
-2 points
Ars Technica - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Ars Technica:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/08/ex-bank-ceo-gets-24-years-after-falling-for-crypto-scam-causing-bank-collapse/

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.4K

    Posts

  • 107K

    Comments