These are just polls, so vote!

Hopefully these trends will inspire people in states that have been consistently red that a flip this election is possible!

134 points

If the apathetic voted it’d be over.

permalink
report
reply
69 points

If all these leftists that don’t vote in protest actually voted, it’d be over. Not just this election, for decades. It would have been a wildly different history.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

That too. My buddy is still angry not voting even after 2016. Because he’s still pissed about the two party system. Fair, but you’re not fixing anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

What a fool. Anyone not voting has no voice and has no right to complain. Nobody will pay attention to them because they offer no action. At that point they may as well be a foreign citizen for the amount of power they hold in the US elections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

He can bemoan the two party system. But if they want to move anything they need to vote. Assuming he wants to move things left, then it’s vote for Dems.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Does he at least vote in the Primary? Love it or hate it, that’s our version of ranked choice voting. Vote for the preferred candidate (someone who supports actual RCV I assume) and then see if you can stomach the winner of the party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not fixing anything indeed.

Https://youtu.be/s7tWHJfhiyo

Refreshing that Lemmy seems to understand first past the post.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Which is why it is very important to understand that tankies are not leftists.

They are agents (willing or stupid) of foreign powers who advocate for fascism. And it is in the interests of their masters (mostly Xinnie the pooh and putin) to encourage leftists to disenfranchise themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

No, it wouldn’t. It’s very difficult to quantify how many people don’t vote as a protest vs. don’t vote out of apathy, but the Green Party, Libertarian Party, and all other third parties combined took home less than 2% of the total vote in the last Presidential election. Even if we assumed that just as many people were staying home in protest, and that they were entirely made up of disgruntled leftists, that would only maybe affect the outcome of some swing states if the numbers are unevenly distributed. It certainly wouldn’t remake history.

The internet (and Lemmy especially) might be full of high-minded leftists claiming they stay home on moral principle, but the majority of people who don’t vote are just tired, working class people who have to squeeze voting in around work and family on a random Tuesday. If you want them to turn out, you have to give them a candidate that speaks to them enough that they’ll take time out of their day vote. (Well, that or a make mail-in voting universal in all 50 states, or make voting day a federal holiday, or a bunch of other things that will never get through Congress.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I think president Gore would have been a very different (and better) history. Ditto Hilary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Singer of my band in 2000,

“well if my green party vote gets a Republican elected, the pendulum swings further right which forces the left to activate,”

surprised Pikachu at GOP stealing election,

status quo shifts right in all levels of the courts for quarter century,

leftists learn Gaza exists,

rinse, repeat

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Literally accelerationism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

As a person from country with multiple-party parliamentary system, I have bad news for you. It is not really guarantee of anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

most of the far left perpetually online leftists are just part of the horseshoe theory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

Gee, if only there were some way to get them excited to vote. Moving to the right hasn’t worked and neither has shouting abuse at them, so I guess nothing will make them happy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

Gee if only they could think about how their vote would move the Overton window.

But you just said, they rely on their feeeeelllliinngggs. Guess they aren’t so logical huh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

I’ve just said this recently (like earlier today), but its not necessarily apathy.

Many people had to work multiple jobs, couldn’t get a vote by mail option, their local polling place had too few voting booths relative to the number of voters, etc, etc.

As soon as mail in voting became accessible, the number of voters actually voting jumped massively.

Preventing access to voting is an international act, and dismissing people as just being apathetic for not having the time to wait a few hours to vote (because kids, work, etc) is part of that intention.

Don’t just be dismissive. Support a national holiday for election day. Support politicians who want to keep mail in voting for all. And don’t look down on people who are put into situations where voting instead of showing up to work could make them lose their jobs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Exactly. People share articles every week about Republican voter suppression tactics like limiting polling locations and creating voter ID laws, then turn around and whine when voters don’t show up for their candidates. Even if you aren’t a victim of these laws, if you have to vote in person, you usually have 12 hours on a weekday to vote. If you work 8 hours a day, and you commute an hour each way, that’s 2 hours to vote. For a working-class person with a family, that’s a big ask. That’s time they normally spend making dinner for their kids and getting ready for the next day. Voting is a right, but having the time to do it a luxury.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Your voting experience really needs an upgrade.

We have a holiday to go vote - well, 3 hours off - and our setup is so simple that we have polling stations everywhere. When we get there it’s usually a 5-minute process. The whole thing is over by that night.

This whole “standing in line for hours” thing is just weird, y’all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Agreed.

My polling station is great, I’m in and out in 15 minutes. I work from home, and in the past when I didn’t, I just used mail in voting.

Not everyone is lucky enough to have those options.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s usually a 5 minute process in TX too, people just wait until the very last minute to cast a vote.

We have had a 2 week voting period since 1980, we were actually the first state to allow an early voting period. The polls are Aldo legally required to be open at least 9 hours the first week and at least 12 hours the second week and final day of voting. If there’s even a line during the first 2 weeks, it’s 10 minutes max. People just drag their feet and then complain to everyone else, which keeps people from voting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

TX has 2 weeks to vote. There’s never a line longer than 10 minutes if there’s a line at all, except for the final day. It’s definitely apathy, waiting until the last day.

This year, polls will be open from Oct 21- Nov 1, with a final day to cast a vote on Nov 5. Polls will be open at least 9 hours the first week and at least 12 hours (typically 7AM-7PM) during the second week and final day of voting. Polling hours and locations can be checked at www.votetexas.gov once they are released in October. Some polls may be open on the weekend as well!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Great info for Texas, thank you. Early voting during that second week is my favorite. The first few days, there may be some small lines (depending on local population, etc). But that’s usually a good sign. If Texans voted appropriately, could even demand (gasp) mail-in ballots. For now, just thankful they haven’t taken early voting…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Ah, who cares about them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

Yelling at people to be excited will fix that!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It kind of does yea. Hey, be hopeful, help your neighbor, and the future is bright is a much better message than “we hate everyone”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points
*

People have real concerns that the party refuses to address. No amount of yelling at them will generate enthusiasm if their concerns are being ignored. “Shut up and be happy” is not a compelling message. It’s just the laziest, bluntest form of toxic positivity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points

Honestly though, can you imagine the absolutely apocalyptic meltdown the RNC establishment would have if fucking Texas can be flipped?

permalink
report
reply
42 points

They’d just call it ultimate proof of election theft :/

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

no doubt the federally indicted ken paxton would be more than willing to commit more crimes to stop a democratic victory in texas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You mean Ken Paxton who was impeached by his own party. While Ken was acquitted, you really have to fuck up have your Republican party vote to impeach you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Even Hillary almost flipped the state. If only 5% more of the registered voters had cast a vote for her, she would have won! The problem is that people just won’t go to the polls. We were the first state to have an early voting period (since 1980) but people just won’t take 15 minutes to stop by a polling station on their way somewhere. There’s never a line during the 2 weeks weeks of early voting.

Check voter registration and polling location/hours (won’t be posted until October) at www.votetexas.gov

Polls open Oct 21-Nov 1, with one final day to vote on Nov 5. Don’t procrastinate and you won’t have to wait in line!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Some counties even have live wait time meters on the map. I’ve found locations on the way to work without scheduling and been on time haha.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I hadn’t seen that before! That’s cool

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

texas isn’t a red state; texas is a voter suppression state.

permalink
report
reply
25 points
*

More than people realize. Between the Civil War and this century, the Texas delegation to the US House of Representatives was Majority-Democrat. We had a Democratic governor just 3 Governors ago.

But in 2003 the Texas legislature went majority-Republican for the first time in over a century, and the first thing they did was massively gerrymander the state just a year after it had been redistricted for the 2000 census.

In the 2002 election, 17 Democrats and 15 Republicans were elected to the US House. Following the redistricting, the 2004 election had 21 Republicans and 11 Republicans elected to the House.

With a single map change they went from a minority to a 2:1 majority.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Same is true for Georgia

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Texas is also a voter apathy state. A lot of the apathy comes from gerrymandering, which I’d call a form of voter suppression, so your point still stands.

Also reminder for every state except Maine and Nebraska: your voting district has NO effect on who gets the electoral college vote for your state. Even if your state is gerrymandered to all hell and there’s no chance your district will go blue, that has literally zero affect on whether your vote is counted for president.

So go vote, even if it’s hopeless for the local races. Your vote can help flip a state!

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Yeah, I had a 5 minute wait to vote in my (majority red) area. 30 minutes away in (majority blue) Dallas, wait times were in the hours, because they keep closing polling locations in blue areas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’ve moved from Denton County to Dallas since the last election. I’m curious to see the difference in voting. Lewisville was staunch Republican area. Voting took about thirty minutes surrounded by red hats with scowling faces in line.

permalink
report
parent
reply
77 points

That’s very hopeful. A five-point spread can be overcome. And I’m still wondering what the polling error will be this year. For the last few years, Democrats have handily out-performed the polls, and it’s not like people under 50 are getting easier to poll.

But don’t get complacent. It’s possible the polls this year are over-correcting for that. We won’t know for sure until the election is over.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

But don’t get complacent. It’s possible the polls this year are over-correcting for that. We won’t know for sure until the election is over.

Not only that. You may need a quite healthy margin to overcome the various voter suppression and other plans the Rs have in place to steal the election. A Texas sized margin might do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

I’m hoping that Harris/Walz spends a few resources here, to make Republicans nervous. Not a LOT of resources, but enough to make the Republicans nervous. We need Dems to turn out in all 50 states, Safe Red, Safe Blue, or whatever, to ensure that we have a resounding victory. Fellow voters, you shouldn’t need to be told this, but if a few million here or there in Texas and Florida gets Dems out to vote while putting the fear of Dog into Republicans and force THEM to spend resources there, it’s a good strategy in my book.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Same, Repugs forced to defend in TX is a victory in and of itself.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.4K

    Posts

  • 109K

    Comments