The Affordable Care Act is back under attack. Not as in the repeal-and-replace debates of yore, but in a fresher take from Republican lawmakers who say key parts of the ACA cost taxpayers too much and provide incentive for fraud.

Several House Republican leaders have called on two watchdog agencies to investigate, while Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) fired off more than half a dozen questions in a recent letter to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

While potential fraud in government programs has always been a rallying cry for conservatives, the recent criticisms are a renewed line of attack on the ACA because repealing it is unlikely, given that more than 21 million people enrolled in marketplace plans for this year.

74 points

conservatives hate ultraconservative healthcare program they created because money is more important than human beings

the ‘pro life’ party, folks.

permalink
report
reply
57 points

These motherfuckers sure hate people having healthcare

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Take away their health insurance paid by taxpayers ez. Also ban them from buying any private insurance

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Congress should be enrolled in the base tier Medicare program and barred from buying any private insurance on top. Health insurance reform would follow within 6mo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Congress was actually mandated to use the exchanges created by the ACA. It was an amendment proposed by a Republican, who bought the narrative that Democrats were forcing bad insurance on the American people, and would never subject themselves to it. Democrats actually thought that was a great idea and went for it.

Republicans have since railed against the amendment they proposed, claiming Democrats opted themselves out of Obamacare.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

No, no, MAKE them buy private insurance. Force them to understand how completely fucked up that industry is. Regularly audit their intersections with those companies as part of their regular financial disclosures to make sure they aren’t getting a deal from their carriers for favorable legislative results.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The problem is that there are some relatively good private insurance plans out there, of you can afford them. It isn’t all fucked up, just what the bottom 75% can afford.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

True, but those plans are not cheap, and congresspeople, while not at all poor, don’t make all that much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They most likely have private insurance on top of their govt plan. The top tier shit where the doctor comes to you

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

So they’re complaining about fraud perpetrated by unscrupulous private insurers and calling for more government oversight? Watch out, boys, you’re dangerously close to getting it!

Too bad their proposed “solutions” are ass-backwards victim-blaming.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Grassley is turning 91 in a month. Probably mad he’s gonna die soon so he wants others to join him by not having healthcare.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

That kind of evil never dies. He’s a very calm, insidious type of evil. Not the rage-filled kind like trump. Hell outlive your kids, while a painting gets older and older.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.9K

    Posts

  • 161K

    Comments