According to the Florida Board of Medicine, Dr. Ishwari Prasad couldn’t hear the patients yelling in pain because he wasn’t wearing his hearing aids. He’s not allowed to perform colonoscopies for now.

111 points

Was there not a whole team? It’s not a solo procedure.

permalink
report
reply
120 points

Others were in there, but he apparently ignored them…

According to the Herald, the order said that Prasad “continued to insert the scope despite being told to wait and began to thrust the scope into (the patient’s) rectum while (the patient) shouted in pain.”

…or misunderstood them?

The outlet also reported that a hospital administrator had been present in the room and told Prasad he needed to wait, to which the gastroenterologist "leaned over (the patient) and shouted “I know!” to the administrator, yet continued to manipulate the scope.”

Dude needs to lose his license.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Not a big fan of sue to sue, but this is the time. Show the hospital they must take further action.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Holy fuck, that’s horrible

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

The secret is, all power is in the doctor who can fuck with everybody else’s careers, while he gets to go chat with a “review board” of his buddies from med school.

I think this is the primary reason they fight so hard against nurses getting more responsibility.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I know a lotta MDs and it’s depressing how accurate this is, particularly the last part. Also a huge culture of sexism exists among doctors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Considering about half of them falsely believe that black people feel less pain, I’m going to add in some racism to your list.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

As a woman and a DO medical student, I have been pushing back on this stuff when I see it and have been challenging my classmates and professors if they are being assholes about anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

John Oliver (predictably) does a great segment on medical review boards, and iirc it comes down to medical review boards being 100% ex-doctors who have strong predispositions and bias against reprimanding or punishing doctors, along with strong opposition to ‘non-medical’ trained people being included as an impartial and ‘common sense’ balance to reviews.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Not even the board. Their Union is one of the last strong ones and hoo-boy do they get to throw their weight around on medical institutions. They play super hardball when an institution or employees of the institution dares try to correct someone in the Union.

permalink
report
parent
reply
97 points

In one instance at the Tampa Ambulatory Surgery Center in June 2023, Prasad “improperly delegated” tasks to a surgical tech, the complaint reads. The tech did not have a medical license but was instructed by Prasad to perform at least one inappropriate task from a list that includes scope insertion, scope manipulation, manipulating an instrument over polyps or tissue, or removing polyps or tissue.

“(Prasad) did not immediately stop the procedure when it became apparent that (the patient) was not fully sedated,” and he failed to realize it because he could not hear the yells, says the complaint. Tasks were also inappropriately delegated to a non-licensed tech during the procedure, the complaint says.

Not once but twice did he instruct a non qualified person to perform medical producers. Pretty open and shut case for pulling his license.

permalink
report
reply
-23 points
*

Apprenticeships… Probs will not be a popular comment, but there’s an argument for learning on the job, if the apprentice and teacher are both at the right level, it’s safe etc.

[Edit] In this scenario it seems it was not the best choice as the teacher should have worn their hearing aid, but the practice of delegating tasks is not a bad thing in general, imho.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

a tech is not an apprentice doctor. medical school has plenty of initial practice on corpses before you are on the living.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

Fair enough, I don’t know who, can do what in this scenario.

Edit with a silly comment but I’m not too sure how much a corpse will respond to rough treatment

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Performing surgery on someone and putting up a sheet of drywall have very different stakes

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Not qualified to do. There is no " go ahead and try," if you didn’t get the education first. That is how you kill people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

A tech is not an intern doctor, a tech has not gone to medical school.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
23 points

Even if the doctor couldn’t hear, couldn’t they see or feel the patient moving in pain?

permalink
report
reply
17 points

The person may have been sedated enough to not be able to move but was able to feel pain and even get out a “scream.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Yeah, this more reads like he was not even in the room and they used the hearing aid schtick as an excuse to make it less bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
USA Today - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for USA Today:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/08/16/florida-doctor-ishwari-prasad-colonoscopies-hearing-aids/74830310007/

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.4K

    Posts

  • 108K

    Comments