14 points
*

New York State, south of Albany.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Is it possible to scale it up, like a condo? To limit the urban sprawl?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Somewhat; the highest-density housing is going to be a net consumer of energy from elsewhere though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The Passive House concept by itself can scale up. However, it is expected that you might need to bring in more power from elsewhere at one point when solar alone isn’t sufficient to cover local demand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

It really isn’t all that special (though I started to skim it). Triple pane windows, heat exchanger on hvac, solar panels.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I wonder if they also have awnings over south facing windows. It’s an old practice (in the Northern Hemisphere) to reduces summer sunlight but allow the winter sun to come through the windows

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I too watch technology connections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

As long as residents have access to local, durable energy generation that isn’t at risk of outages: very cool.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

That’s where local battery storage/EVs come in. Also passivhaus in and of itself is a form of resiliency - if the power goes out during a cold snap, the house will stay warm for quite some time, and the dozen kWh in a battery or the several dozen in an EV go alot further. Efficiency has a multiplying effect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Absolutely, that’s exactly what I’m talking about.

One of the current benefits of having natural gas piped into a house is having a completely distinct power supply system, where one could cook, heat the home, heat water (sanitation), power a generator (plumbed in line), etc.

I’m not saying this is a bad project, I’m just saying that is an adoption challenge to be addressed (resiliency, failover)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Right, but remember only like 60% of homes have gas anyway, so that’s not necessarily the baseline from a resiliency perspective. And a huge chunk of those aren’t actually prepared to operate without electricity either. So while I agree that resiliency is worth focusing on, we should also look holistically about what gas can/cannot do and the associated costs relative to electrification/solar/storage. A modern gas home will still need a backup generator to run condensing hot water/furnace and there’s a significant cost to whole home generators, so it’s not all fun and games just having gas appliances.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Judging from the picture: single-family home with no access to public transport. I’m guessing my emissions from a small apartment close to urban rail is still lower than theirs, even if I heat with gas.

I’m not saying it’s a useless project, but the root problem in America is urban sprawl, making almost every aspect of life overly wasteful, in material and energy.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Given how close heating and residential gas use emissions are to personal vehicle emissions it’s likely to come down to efficiency of the cars involved and if their solar powered or not.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 4.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.1K

    Posts

  • 7.4K

    Comments

Community moderators