-8 points
Mediaite - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Mediaite:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.mediaite.com/news/teamsters-president-who-spoke-at-rnc-slams-trumps-position-on-firing-striking-workers-economic-terrorism/

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Slams! Dut duh duh, dut duh duh. Let the boys be boys!

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Well THAT’S a blast from the past

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Come on and slam and welcome to the jam!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Pump up the jam

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points
*

Dude tried to play both sides against the middle as the GOP was fumbling the ball.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Blue collar union dipshits are a majority Trump supporters and don’t think they’re voting against their interests. Its not surprising he went to the RNC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

He never supported Trump. His speech was phenomenal. Maybe you should go listen to it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

lol did you listen to his speech at the RNC?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

^this take:

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I recommend actually listening to the speech, he was very much not playing both sides

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Alternative Headline: Union boss who sold out for power flip-flops after angering its paying members and realizing he will likely lose current position next union election cycle. This and more at 11…

permalink
report
reply
24 points
*

Did you watch his speech? He wasn’t there cause he sold out. He was there to give a message. Your kneejerk reaction shows you didn’t even watch his speech.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

No shit right?

Most lemmings don’t seem to be able to get past a sophmore level of analysis on politics.

To Lemmy users who just don’t get it: The headline was “Headline speaker at night one of RNC refuses to endorse Trump”

Sean O’Brien used the RNC as a platform to deliver the most pro-labor, pro-progressive, anti-capitalist speech of ALL TIME. As in, hands down, the most progressive speech, at ANY major party political convention EVER.

He took the platform, and didnt endorse the candidate. Do you have any idea how big of a fucking deal that is?

If you are mad that Sean O’Brien took the opportunity to use a platform he was offered to speak truth to power, this is you:

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Full disclosure I haven’t watched the speech, but I can believe it was in good faith, no doubt pro-labor/anti-capitalist. (btw, it’s crazy how bad the Democratic party has alienated the working class)

What I can’t believe is these disturbing-ass memes you’re posting lmao…I hate them very much and wish I could unsee. Good job!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

To be fair it hasn’t paid dividends weeding through mountains of vitriolic, bigotry and small-mindedness for a literal diamond in the rough. It’s not too far fetched to see how many could think speaking at a party convention for fascist asshats is a tacit endorsement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

He didn’t sell out for power.

He sold out because Teamsters leadership is racist as fuck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Did he sell out at all though?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah thats not happening

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Did media ask him when he is going to rescind his endorsement?

permalink
report
reply
7 points

When did he endorse someone?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

He explicitly didn’t endorse a candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I don’t think he implicitly endorced anyone either

Reading comprehension fail on my part

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 187K

    Comments