Dire financial straits are leading droves of Olympic athletes to sell images of their bodies to subscribers on OnlyFans — known for sexually explicit content — to sustain their dreams of gold at the Games. As they struggle to make ends meet, a spotlight is being cast on an Olympics funding system that watchdog groups condemn as “broken,” claiming most athletes “can barely pay their rent.”

The Olympics, the world’s biggest sporting stage, bring in billions of dollars in TV rights, ticket sales and sponsorship, but most athletes must fend for themselves financially.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) did not express concern about the situation. When asked by The Associated Press about athletes turning to OnlyFans, IOC spokesman Mark Adams said, “I would assume that athletes, like all citizens, are allowed to do what they can.”

Watching his sponsorships dry up and facing mounting costs, Jack Laugher was among the pantheon of Olympic athletes using the often-controversial platform to get to the Games — or simply survive.

164 points

The Olympics was intended for amateur athletes, but they’re all essentially professionals now if they have any chance of medaling (the Turkish shooter excepted) because they get years of specialized training. And, of course, they find endless new ways to abuse those athletes’ bodies by using ever-more sophisticated ways to secretly dope them.

Half of them will be broken by the time they’re 30. I’m not at all surprised that this is what they have to resort to.

permalink
report
reply
110 points

And the Olympics being for “amateurs” was a deliberate effort by the Olympic committee when the modern games were started to exclude the working classes from competing.

The whole “best of the best” is just branding. The Olympics needs serious reform.

permalink
report
parent
reply
100 points

Yeah, by “amateurs” they meant wealthy men who didn’t work and so had spare time to get good at sport. Really good Behind the Bastards episodes that touch on this actually.

Behind the Bastards - Part One: How Avery Brundage Gave Hitler an Olympics

Behind the Bastards - Part Two: How Avery Brundage Gave Hitler an Olympics

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Hell yeah, another BTB listener? There’s dozens of us, dozens!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A fellow podcast addict user, I see.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Another 19th century thing that was exclusionary at its beginning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

Do you know why? Because rich people didn’t want to compete against the poor. If you couldn’t afford to compete, you didn’t. The rich can’t didn’t fancy meeting Gary the local bouncer in a boxing match.

History of Olympics is fucked up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

History of everything is fucked up.

Power, money, and violence are usually how things go, the bubble of “freedom” that has existed for a few hundred years maybe be yielding.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There are still a few amateurs left: L. James, S. Curry, RayGunn

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

Don’t worry, Coca-Cola and the like will continue making buckets of cash from the Olympics…

Wait non companies need money too?

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Maybe the athletes can sell shares of themselves, provide dividends and engage in stock buy-back. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

Should pay them with the advertising revenue they make possible.

permalink
report
reply
50 points

i feel like these athletes need to have a plan B for real jobs.

the olympics have been bastardized into a corporate for-profit orgy. theres no honor in these games. its sad that these humans who feel they are accomplishing something dont see the truth; theyre just tools that can be discarded.

permalink
report
reply
34 points
*

its sad that these humans who feel they are accomplishing something dont see the truth; theyre just tools that can be discarded.

They are accomplishing something. It’s just not recognized by the greedy fuckwits exploiting their achievements for profit, other than for it’s ability to convince people to endure their bullshit in exchange for the chance to watch them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

Well, the plan is to get corporate sponsors. That’s always been the road.

Edit: always as in the past ~50 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

really? which corps sponsored the roman olympics?

or is this a recent requirement because humans dont actually put money into humanities without some profit incentive?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I edited the comment prior to your reply specifying the last 50 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

In the Roman Olympics, only rich people could compete. Now it’s better, not perfect, but better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Trojan?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m wondering about viewership this year. Nobody I know is watching or talking about the games. Besides what hits social media like the Turkish shooter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s extremely popular. Every single business I’ve walked into has had it on the TV and all of my friend/family group chats and coworkers have been talking about it. It wouldn’t be making hundreds of millions in ad revenue if nobody was watching it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

A lot of people I know are watching, and more than just the memes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Link to livestreams of the orgy competition?

Groove Tube was 50 years ahead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

You can’t win if you have a plan B. Especially in prestige events. Either the athlete is fully supported by their countries association or they hope to get top 30.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

If you can imagine the ancient Olympics with all those naked male athletes running and flexing, the sex trade would have been happening back then too.

Lots of consensual sex happens in modern Olympic villages today, because just healthy young people getting together.

permalink
report
reply
76 points
*

I thought the point being made here is that they should be making enough money to not have to resort to Only fans.

What does whether they’re getting it on in camp or not have to do with this article?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

I think people are forgetting something, which is that younger people like clout. OnlyFans isn’t really that taboo for a lot of younger people. It’s associated with being hot and making money. A lot of Olympians probably WANTED their OnlyFans to pop off because they thought it was cool. And they don’t have to show full nudes or sex, many just post in swimsuits, softcore porn, or tasteful covered nudes. Being “forced” to do OnlyFans is a bit of a stretch for some athletes, but I agree that the games in general are exploiting the athletes. I think the games themselves could be considered a type of sex work, though.

While some athletes say they don’t see what they’re doing as sex work, German diver Bartel put it frankly: “In sport, you wear nothing but a Speedo, so you’re close to being naked.”

“The entire funding model for Olympic sport is broken. The IOC generates now over US$1.7 billion per year and they refuse to pay athletes who attend the Olympics,” said Rob Koehler, Global Athlete’s director general.

He criticized the IOC for forcing athletes to sign away their image rights.

“The majority of athletes can barely pay their rent, yet the IOC, national Olympic committees and national federations that oversee the sport have employees making over six figures. They all are making money off the backs of athletes. In a way, it is akin to modern-day slavery,” Koehler said.

It is amazing how sex work specifically makes people hate capitalism. People don’t mind a capitalist, but as soon as that capitalist is a pimp or madame, then they can see the immorality

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

younger people like clout.

How to make a self in a broad cultural landscape of confomity?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It is amazing how sex work specifically makes people hate capitalism. People don’t mind a capitalist, but as soon as that capitalist is a pimp or madame, then they can see the immorality

Cause sex work allows social mobility. The feudalistic lords also hated merchants cause they threatened the social hierarchy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You are aggressively missing the point. Don’t you think “the youths” would prefer being able to pay rent over clout? Onlyfans isn’t the problem here, the point is it should be something they have the option to do rather than the only way to afford to compete.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Problem is that people in the Olympics aren’t supposed to be professional athletes. IOW they can’t make any money off their skills. I think the Olympic rules have sought to reinforce that not because they really don’t want paid athletes, just that they want everyone surrounding the Olympic entertainment industry to get paid instead. Networks, venues, vendors, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The IOC hasn’t required amateur status since 1988. Some sports still do, as the IOC mostly relies on the governing bodies for each sport to set the rules, but for the Olympics as a whole, that’s a relic of the past.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I just watched LeBron James play in the Olympic basketball gold medal game earlier this afternoon so this most definitely is not the case anymore

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Isn’t it up to the athletes then to not participate and boycott the olympics until they treat their talent better?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The aura of amateur status still looms large.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I reckon that it is to fund their own training when their government is too corrupt and uncaring to support them. Us in the West take for granted that the government provide support to train prospective athletes; but it’s not so much in developing countries. The Philippines’ first ever Olympic gold medallist- Hydeline Diaz- won two years ago in Tokyo. But prior to that, she begged and implored to both the public and the government to provide financial support her aspirations to compete in the Olympics but she was shunned. It was only after she won gold, unexpectedly, that everyone tried to rub their shoulders with her to play as sycophants. This year, Filipino politicians and business elites have also been brown nosing themselves to Carlos Yulo after winning two gold medals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The athlete mentioned here is a British diver.

England is a Wester country, I presume, so I guess your assumption is at least partially wrong: even in the west some athletes might not be making ends meet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Maybe the wealthy countries should fund grants to athletes whose countries won’t support them, whether due to poverty or corruption.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t think it should be for the government to fund you. There are other much better ways of spending public money. If you participate I a sport that no one watches (and thus you can’t get a sponsor), why should we fund that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Maybe for developing countries, it’s better to fund 1000 teachers instead of 1000 Olympic hopefuls

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

*extremely healthy in peak physical condition riding high on adrenaline.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.9K

    Posts

  • 162K

    Comments