12 points

Please, please litigate this issue AFTER she wins. Everyone is far worse off for all sorts of other reasons if she doesn’t.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Please, please litigate this issue AFTER she wins.

When it can be ignored.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

When voters no longer have any power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Like we did with Biden, and were called Russian bots, ChatGPT accounts, and other thought terminating cliches?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

“You know what? If you want Donald Trump to win, then say that. Otherwise, I’m speaking,” Harris said

Maybe if you don’t want Donald Trump to win you should show some backbone and stand up to your fascist Israeli masters.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Yes! Absolutely this! The best way to win is to alienate the largest group of people possible and turn them towards your opponent. This is such a masterful political strategy. It’s a wonder more people with this view don’t hold office./s

It would be wonderful to see pro-democracy and pro peace groups holding as much resources and influence as groups like aipac does. Being able to offer candidates that sort of security. The sad truth is we can’t. And that we have to work within and compromise with groups we very often despise in order to get anything positive done. The honest truth is that we represent nothing more than a slightly more secure margin of winning. But only when added on to all the rest not by ourselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It would be wonderful to see pro-democracy and pro peace groups holding as much resources and influence as groups like aipac does. Being able to offer candidates that sort of security. The sad truth is we can’t.

We really can’t. AIPAC has the money if a country that gets unending support. Americans can barely afford rent. Americans are paycheck to paycheck and can’t afford sudden expenses, like medical care and bills.

This is intentional at this point. If the people who need to vote for you don’t have the money, but the corporate and international lobbyists can fund and sway the politicians more than the general public, it’s a win/win. They get elected, pay back the companies who got them into office, and the people who got them in feel accomplished, when neither the companies or candidates care about any of the voters.

Trump won because the poor and rural people who saw some dude talking what they wanted to hear, and he wasn’t bound to them, he was bound to thr corps and Russians donating to him.

To stop this would stop the income of Politicians across every step of government, local, state, and federal. Super PACs outweigh any of the members of Lemmy or the Fediverse. What we want doesn’t matter.

If we want to stop AIPAC, we would have to stop the same things that enable Russia to fund candidates. Republicans would keepto any money flowing, Democrats would want to keep any money flowing for them. Sensible people want less money in politics. Politicians don’t.

Lobbying is good for them, and bad for us. Lobbying defunds welfare, education, healthcare, and puts that money into the pockets of the wealthy.

And that’s not to say “both sides”, one party often has members who want to stop this. One party has a progressive wing, one party has a fascist majority. But both together will probably prohibit overturning Citizens United.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If we just don’t talk about genocide, perhaps it will go away?

permalink
report
reply
27 points

This is a rally, not a town hall. PLUS she did meet with them, before the rally, then mentioned that when they first interrupted her rally, then she finally told them to shut up because they kept interrupting in a completely nonproductive way

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

She met with some of the leaders of the uncommitted movment right before this very rally. Her strategy is not to completely ignore it

A poor choice of words made in the spur of the moment doesn’t necessarily reflect how she’s been acting about it

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Have you heard about AIPAC spending loads of money to take out pro-Palenstinian incumbents in the primaries? They can probably cause Harris more trouble in the election than the pro-Palestinian protesters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Election interference is only when it comes from Russia. Otherwise it’s sparkling grassroots.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

The good old ‘shut up or we’ll give you a proto-fascist’ vibe. Very reminiscent of Hillary in 2016.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It still is far more important that she win this election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Then she should not be dismissing real concerns as Trump support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

She really screwed up with that response. Ugh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points
*

The point is, Harris fucked up by saying this. IN MICHIGAN! SMH… liberalism at work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

She handled this in the worst way. I’m not going to get mad at protesters who want to see an end to genocide. Even Biden had a more humbling response.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Well, nice things don’t last forever

permalink
report
reply
-3 points

This same news article posted in News got me another ban from there hah

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Reporting actual news is actually heavily biased fake news, just like when NBC reports when Trump is being horrid according to Republicans.

Factual statements? Biased, nitpicking. Please ignore that I too am biased, and that all media is biased.

Reporting on polling? Polls suck, never believe them.

Reporting that people want Biden gone? Biden is never going to leave! …I mean, he always was going to!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Funny that my first ban from there was because I kept saying Biden needed to drop out and be replaced.

Now that same crowd that said I was a Trumper is doing the “YAAAS KAMALA! SO GLAD JOE DROPPED OUT!”. Oh well lol

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 188K

    Comments